- From: Charmane K. Corcoran <corcora1@msu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:06:56 -0400
- To: "wai eo editors" <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <a05210601bca4498c41dd@[35.12.17.178]>
1. Identifying Technical Factors for a Specific Organization * How important is it to the organization to: o enable content on different configurations? provide interoperability? o be prepared for advanced Web technologies? provide future-compatibility of the organization's technology? The second part of the two bottom bullets here are not used correctly. If they are used here as phrases and the bullets are used later in the documents as headers then you would expect them to also be part of the header below. They are not part of the header. The second option is that the same phrases would be used in the paragraph under those headers but seem not to appear though in some regards are discussed. The question is, if the phrase is not replicated in the discussion, then should it appear here? I believe it should not appear here unless you are going to repeat it below either as part of the header or replicate it in the text with explanation. Otherwise it is sort of a disconnected piece. You may somewhat answer it but because you do not specifically restate with this phrasiology, the normal reader will not necessarily connect the question with the answer. 2. * How important is it to the organization to have high-quality Web sites that meet international standards and guidelines? Many of the technical factors relating to Web accessibility, including many of the WCAG 1.0 Checkpoints listed in the sections below, lead to high quality sites that meet W3C international standards and guidelines for Web technology. @@maybe say that there are documents extoling the virtues & business case for Web standards in general, and often directly include accessibility @@ This item seems like it belongs in the document but it seems somewhat out of place. This too looks like you would expect it to be replicated below as a header with further explanation but it has neither a header or more explanation. I would suggest changing its level here so that there is no expectation of more below but that it is a paragraph further amplifying what the reader will be viewing as they read the headers below. The position is fine but the level is deceiving. -- MSU: Advancing Knowledge. Transforming Lives. Libraries, Computing & Technology: Connecting People and Information ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Have a Productive Day! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Charmane K. Corcoran Information & Project Principal Michigan State University Client Advocacy Office 316A Computer Center East Lansing MI 48824 E-mail: corcora1@msu.edu Phone: Dept. Office - 517/353-4856 Direct/Vmail - 517/355-4500 Ext. 244 FAX: Office: 517/355-0141 HmPg: http://www.msu.edu/~corcora1/
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2004 12:41:21 UTC