- From: Charmane K. Corcoran <corcora1@msu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:06:56 -0400
- To: "wai eo editors" <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <a05210601bca4498c41dd@[35.12.17.178]>
1. Identifying Technical Factors for a Specific Organization
* How important is it to the organization to:
o enable content on different configurations? provide
interoperability?
o be prepared for advanced Web technologies? provide
future-compatibility of the organization's technology?
The second part of the two bottom bullets here are not used
correctly. If they are used here as phrases and the bullets are used
later in the documents as headers then you would expect them to also
be part of the header below. They are not part of the header. The
second option is that the same phrases would be used in the paragraph
under those headers but seem not to appear though in some regards are
discussed.
The question is, if the phrase is not replicated in the discussion,
then should it appear here? I believe it should not appear here
unless you are going to repeat it below either as part of the header
or replicate it in the text with explanation. Otherwise it is sort of
a disconnected piece. You may somewhat answer it but because you do
not specifically restate with this phrasiology, the normal reader
will not necessarily connect the question with the answer.
2. * How important is it to the organization to have high-quality
Web sites that meet international standards and guidelines?
Many of the technical factors relating to Web accessibility,
including many of the WCAG 1.0 Checkpoints listed in the sections
below, lead to high quality sites that meet W3C international
standards and guidelines for Web technology. @@maybe say that there
are documents extoling the virtues & business case for Web standards
in general, and often directly include accessibility @@
This item seems like it belongs in the document but it seems somewhat
out of place. This too looks like you would expect it to be
replicated below as a header with further explanation but it has
neither a header or more explanation. I would suggest changing its
level here so that there is no expectation of more below but that it
is a paragraph further amplifying what the reader will be viewing as
they read the headers below. The position is fine but the level is
deceiving.
--
MSU: Advancing Knowledge. Transforming Lives.
Libraries, Computing & Technology: Connecting People and Information
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Have a Productive Day!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Charmane K. Corcoran
Information & Project Principal
Michigan State University
Client Advocacy Office
316A Computer Center
East Lansing MI 48824
E-mail: corcora1@msu.edu
Phone: Dept. Office - 517/353-4856
Direct/Vmail - 517/355-4500 Ext. 244
FAX: Office: 517/355-0141
HmPg: http://www.msu.edu/~corcora1/
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2004 12:41:21 UTC