- From: Paul Lambert <plambert@certicom.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 16:29:40 -0700
- To: "John Boyer" <jboyer@uwi.com>
- cc: "Dsig group" <w3c-xml-sig-ws@w3.org>
John, >Signing XML is a fundamentally different problem. We do not need to learn >from these past efforts if we do not try to duplicate them, as would be the >case if signed XML meant "sign XML then express signature in XML". Signing >XML only requires us to define an interface to call upon these technologies. >As the cryptography experts learn from their past efforts and put out new >standards, our interface will be able to call on the technology that >implements the new standards. All without changing our spec, DTDs, and >software. My proposal was directed at the use of certificates from PGP and X.509. Only one originator should be supported. It is not easy to "call on new technology" that hides relevant information in opaque blobs. I'm obviously in the no-PKCS#7 for XML signatures camp. We will not be able to prevent vendors from defining signature blobs that are based on PKCS#7, but we should not make this our solution provides equivelent functionality in an XML syntax. My objection is based on the granularity of blobs. PKCS#7 has too much information encoded within it's blob. More on this later ... Paul "John Boyer" <jboyer@uwi.com> on 04/21/99 03:38:25 PM To: Paul Lambert/Certicom cc: "Dsig group" <w3c-xml-sig-ws@w3.org> Subject: Re: Single Key in Originator Information >Signing XML is not a fundamental and different problem. We have many >worked examples to learn from like: X.410, X.509, PEM, MOSS, DNS Sec, SDSI, >SPKI, PGP, DMS, and DSig 1.0. <snip/> >So, hopefully we will be able learn from these past efforts. Signing XML is a fundamentally different problem. We do not need to learn from these past efforts if we do not try to duplicate them, as would be the case if signed XML meant "sign XML then express signature in XML". Signing XML only requires us to define an interface to call upon these technologies. As the cryptography experts learn from their past efforts and put out new standards, our interface will be able to call on the technology that implements the new standards. All without changing our spec, DTDs, and software. John Boyer Software Development Manager UWI.Com -- The Internet Forms Company jboyer@uwi.com
Received on Wednesday, 21 April 1999 19:47:40 UTC