- From: John Boyer <jboyer@uwi.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 13:46:43 -0700
- To: "Dsig group" <w3c-xml-sig-ws@w3.org>
As legal evidence of the signer's understandings and intentions, the value of the RDF assertions will be called into question because you cannot even prove that the user saw the RDF assertions. A person cannot be legally bound to a signature on information when it cannot be proven that they even saw it. Therefore, putting RDF into the signature is no different from having a need to put any other application-specific data into the signature. Whether it is RDF or, say, a stylesheet, the bottom line is that we are storing additional information in a signature. Did the signer actually understand the agreement or can he/she make a reasonable claim that a misunderstanding is possible? This is more a problem for the courts. If the RDF is better at communicating the understandings of an agreement for legal purposes, then what that's really saying is that the original agreement is not worded very well and should be rewritten to more effectively communicate the nature of the agreement. Now, this is not to say that RDF assertions in signatures are without value. The above simply states that they are not more valuable than any other method for legal non-repudiation. As I see it, the real value of RDF assertions comes from the ability to provide machine readable semantics, which was the original reason RDF was created. RDF is the 'XML' way of encoding meaning. RDF can't prove whether a user intended a certain meaning, but we leave that issue to other mechanisms. Provided that the RDF correctly carries meaning, we have a machine readable way of trying to get at that meaning. As such, it should be easy to see that Martin Lee's suggestion of a standard vocabulary is required. Further, a standard vocabulary for each domain is required. But in the end, it's not a problem that has to be addressed by the signed XML group. It is more a problem for those who would apply signatures within their domain. John Boyer Software Development Manager UWI.Com -- The Internet Forms Company jboyer@uwi.com
Received on Monday, 19 April 1999 16:42:11 UTC