Re: Normative references in UAAG 2.0

Makes final editing easier
On Dec 11, 2015 4:31 PM, "Jeanne Spellman" <jeanne@w3.org> wrote:

>
> I got an semi-official ruling from the Director-designates that we can
> leave all the normative language in UAAG 2.0.  It is normative within the
> document (including the Conformance section) but it is not a W3C
> Recommendation.  What it means is that browsers can say whether or not they
> conform to UAAG 2.0, but another W3C Recommendation cannot have a normative
> reference to UAAG 2.0.
>
>