- From: Greg Lowney <gcl-0039@access-research.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 23:17:42 -0800
- To: Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>, UAWG <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <54081216.8010406@access-research.org>
Hi Jeanne,
Re 2.2.1 Sequential Navigation Between Elements, I don’t think the added wording is necessary, and in fact the current wording may already be redundant, because:
1. "recognized" is no longer required because we put in UAAG 2.0 Conformance Applicability Note #3, which says all SC about content apply only to content that’s recognized, and
2. "in the rendered content" isn’t strictly necessary because "element" is already defined as being in content.
I also notice, though, that the definition of "element" isn't quite right. It says in part "UAAG 2.0 also uses the term 'element' more generally to mean a type of content (such as video or sound) or a logical construct (such as a header or list)." That seems to be confusing the two terms "element" and "element type". How about replacing that sentence with something like:
"UAAG 2.0 also uses the term 'element' more generally any discrete unit within the content (e.g. a specific image, video, sound, heading, list, or list item)."
And then to add the following sub-definition bullet item (to join the two that are already there):
"element type: a category of elements (such as images, videos, sounds, first level headings, lists, or list items)."
Thanks,
Greg
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: finishing up MS04
From: Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>
To: UAWG <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Date: 9/2/2014 12:25 PM
> 2.2.1 Sequential Navigation Between Elements: The user can move the keyboard focus backwards and forwards through all recognized enabled elements in the current viewport. (Level A)
> Change to "...all recognized enabled elements in the rendered content of the current viewport." [rendered content is linked to definition]
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2014 06:18:48 UTC