- From: Greg Lowney <gcl-0039@access-research.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:14:53 -0800
- To: "Richards, Jan" <jrichards@ocadu.ca>, UAWG <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <53AC550D.9070000@access-research.org>
This looks fine to me. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Proposed new UAAG 2.0 applicability note From: Richards, Jan <jrichards@ocadu.ca> To: UAWG <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org> Date: 6/19/2014 10:51 AM > And editing in a response to another edge case raised on the call.... > > X. Retrieved Content Only: UAAG 2.0 success criteria only apply to web content that has been retrieved by the user agent (e.g. if a user agent saves bandwidth by retrieving video element content only on demand, then captions associated with that video content do not need to be searchable as per 2.4.5 until the video is retrieved). > > [New] Y. Current Content Only: At any point in time, UAAG 2.0 success criteria only apply to web content that have not been hidden or removed (e.g., a bookmark created as per 1.8.17 will no longer be operable if the content it refers to is hidden or removed). > > [Existing] 1. Recognized Content Only: UAAG 2.0 success criteria only apply to web content and its behaviors that can be recognized by user agents. > ... > > Cheers, > Jan > > ________________________________________ > From: Richards, Jan [jrichards@ocadu.ca] > Sent: June-19-14 2:10 PM > To: UAWG > Subject: Proposed new UAAG 2.0 applicability note > > And actually maybe it should be #1 in the list, instead of #8.: > > X. Retrieved Content Only: UAAG 2.0 success criteria only apply to web content that has been retrieved by the user agent (e.g. if a user agent saves bandwidth by loading content on demand, only retrieved content needs to be reflected in its outline view) > > > > Cheers, > Jan > > (MR) JAN RICHARDS > PROJECT MANAGER > INCLUSIVE DESIGN RESEARCH CENTRE (IDRC) > OCAD UNIVERSITY > > T 416 977 6000 x3957 > F 416 977 9844 > E jrichards@ocadu.ca > >
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2014 16:17:11 UTC