- From: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 11:45:59 -0500
- To: WAI-ua <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+=z1Wm5Zg=V9dGL4_9TqMSJm8uB7jbyJWOMrPPdPKA7UoYvBw@mail.gmail.com>
we missed a comment...
please comment on list
existing
3.3.2 Document Accessibility Features: All features of the user agent that
meet User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 success criteria are
documented. (Level A)
comment OCAD42: The corresponding ATAG2 SC was rewritten:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/ATAG20/#sc_a421
OCAD42 [needs proposal]
Proposal: using ATAG as a model, rewrote for UAAG. The ATAG definition as
based on feedback from vendors. It is more comprehensive. I believe the IER
is ok even with the rewording.
3.3.2 Describe Accessibility Features:
For each user agent feature that is used to meet UAAG 2.0, at least one of
the following is true: (Level A)
(a) Described in the Documentation: Use of the feature is explained in
the user agents's documentation; or
(b) Described in the Interface: Use of the feature is explained in the
user agent user interface; or
(c) Platform Service: The feature is a service provided by an
underlying platform; or
(d) Not Used by Users: The feature is not used directly by users (e.g.,
passing information to a platform accessibility service).
--
Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator & Webmaster
Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
voice 512.206.9315 fax: 512.206.9264 http://www.tsbvi.edu/
"We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2013 16:46:21 UTC