- From: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 11:45:59 -0500
- To: WAI-ua <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+=z1Wm5Zg=V9dGL4_9TqMSJm8uB7jbyJWOMrPPdPKA7UoYvBw@mail.gmail.com>
we missed a comment... please comment on list existing 3.3.2 Document Accessibility Features: All features of the user agent that meet User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 success criteria are documented. (Level A) comment OCAD42: The corresponding ATAG2 SC was rewritten: http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/ATAG20/#sc_a421 OCAD42 [needs proposal] Proposal: using ATAG as a model, rewrote for UAAG. The ATAG definition as based on feedback from vendors. It is more comprehensive. I believe the IER is ok even with the rewording. 3.3.2 Describe Accessibility Features: For each user agent feature that is used to meet UAAG 2.0, at least one of the following is true: (Level A) (a) Described in the Documentation: Use of the feature is explained in the user agents's documentation; or (b) Described in the Interface: Use of the feature is explained in the user agent user interface; or (c) Platform Service: The feature is a service provided by an underlying platform; or (d) Not Used by Users: The feature is not used directly by users (e.g., passing information to a platform accessibility service). -- Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator & Webmaster Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired 1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756 voice 512.206.9315 fax: 512.206.9264 http://www.tsbvi.edu/ "We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2013 16:46:21 UTC