- From: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:48:07 -0700
- To: Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>, Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Cc: User Agent Working Group <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Shawn's Conundrum (Mine Too) There is a serious issue as to the User Agent's responsibility regarding element level text customization. User's need to see differences in formatting to understand the organization of the document they are reading, but how much should a user agent intervene in this function. I think none. I am convinced that user agents should only have global text customization commands. These should honor user settings unless users override the setting explicitly. Size is one exception. You have addressed that already. Now, how do we get element level accommodation. The answer is the same way everyone gets it. Turn of author styles, linearize, and apply user styles. Opera already implements user stylesheets this way. That is nice but the user should have a choice. The Answer: The functionality: The user should have the option to (1) Turn of author style, (2) Linearize (not data tables) and (3) Apply a user style to the page obtained after (1) and (2) are applied. Customized style sheets for users will become a standard form of assistive technology for users. Most users will not make them themselves. They will use something like my T-Rx. What the user needs is browser support to apply these style sheets to clean data. Incidentally, iPad already can apply user stylesheets, they just ruin the therapeutic value by not allowing change to link colors. Other e-readers are less robust, but they still could provide a reasonable style-sheet access, and they should. I have found no truly effective e-reader for low vision, and I have used almost all of them.
Received on Thursday, 29 August 2013 19:48:35 UTC