- From: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 11:29:36 -0600
- To: "Richards, Jan" <jrichards@ocadu.ca>
- Cc: UAWG <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+=z1WkqWUpx4=SyCLQ7pT7Vc3cW=TyY3aq-Lw_fu-zBQTMn0A@mail.gmail.com>
list of SC effected by Jan's proposal the SC need to be reworded. 1.1.1 1.1.x 1.1.3 b c 1.1.5 1.3.1 c 2.2.1 2.3.2 2.3.5 2.6.1 2.9.1 2.10.1 2.10.2 gl 2.11 2.11.2 3.1.2 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.4 def of caption def of script jim On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu> wrote: > Jan, > Thanks for this. I like it. I will provide a list of SC to fix in a few > minutes > > Jim > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Richards, Jan <jrichards@ocadu.ca> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> On the Jan 31 call, Jim took this action: >> ACTION-798: Review 'recognized' in SC to make a top level statement >> similar to device independence at the beginning of the document - perhaps >> an applicability note and something in a conformance claim..( >> https://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/tracker/actions/798) >> >> And Eric's excellent review also highlights the repetition of >> "recognized". >> >> I'd like to suggest the following "ported" ATAG2 wording along with a few >> other relevant high level conditions: >> >> 1. Unrecognizable content: Any success criteria that refer to semantic >> features of web content (e.g., text alternatives to non-text content, >> headings, keyboard commands, time limits, etc.) will only apply when those >> features are implemented according to standard semantics for the web >> content technology. When those features are implemented via other means >> (e.g., custom scripting), the content features are not considered >> recognizable and the success criteria do not apply. >> >> 2. User agent systems: As per the UAAG 2.0 definition of user agent, >> several software tools (identified in any conformance claim) can be used in >> conjunction to meet the requirements. For example, a base user agent could >> make use of plug-in to provide certain functionality and a web-based user >> agent may rely on base user agent features (e.g., keyboard navigation, find >> functions, etc.). >> >> 3. Developer control: The success criteria only apply to the user agent >> user interface as it is provided by the developer. They do not apply to any >> subsequent modifications by parties other than the developer (e.g., user >> modifications of default settings, third-party plug-ins). >> >> Cheers, >> Jan >> >> >> (MR) JAN RICHARDS >> PROJECT MANAGER >> INCLUSIVE DESIGN RESEARCH CENTRE (IDRC) >> OCAD UNIVERSITY >> >> T 416 977 6000 x3957 >> F 416 977 9844 >> E jrichards@ocadu.ca >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator & Webmaster > Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired > 1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756 > voice 512.206.9315 fax: 512.206.9264 http://www.tsbvi.edu/ > "We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964 > -- Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator & Webmaster Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired 1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756 voice 512.206.9315 fax: 512.206.9264 http://www.tsbvi.edu/ "We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2013 17:29:59 UTC