- From: Simon Harper <simon.harper@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 09:17:38 +0100
- To: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>, UAWG list <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <51B82EA2.4030608@manchester.ac.uk>
Hi everyone, The extensible web returns from one of our own community groups. Extensibility worries me - for many many reasons. But wrt UAAG does a non standard extension not using the open web platform need to pass uaag as it isn't technically a Web standard? Also, in more general terms is this kind of extensibility something we should be worried about. Cheers -------- Original Message -------- Subject: The Extensible Web Manifesto [feedly] Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 22:52:28 +0100 From: Simon Harper <simon.harper@manchester.ac.uk> To: Simon Harper <simon.harper@manchester.ac.uk> Shared via feedly <http://bit.ly/SA6Efh> // published on Community and Business Groups // visit site <http://www.w3.org/community/nextweb/2013/06/11/the-extensible-web-manifesto/> *The Extensible Web Manifesto* *Yesterday, it was made official that our group, by the intermediate of his founders, co-signed a manifesto <http://extensiblewebmanifesto.org> for a more extensible web.* Some of you may ask yourself what it may actually mean, and why this is important. This is for this reason we decided to write this blog post. An extensible web is a web where web developers are totally incorporated in the innovation scheme of the web platform, and can actually build new features instead of just relying on the ones browser vendors could agree on. *Being able to extend the browser means many things.* Firstly, it means you can provide a new feature to older versions of a browser, by implementing it in JavaScript. Currently, this approach (called polyfilling) requires a lot of hacking knowledge because web developers are not granted the same access to the browser features than browser vendors itself. One of our goal is too make surthat, when possible, web browsers leave a little bit of room to web developers to extend the browser features, without requiring us to reimplement them from scratch. The second reason an extensible web is more beautiful is that, when APIs are created inside the walled gardens of the standards committees, sometimes mistakes can be made. Mistakes are normal. No process can be free of mistakes. However, the problem with the current standards process is that it’s slow and irreversible. *Once something shipped in a browser, removing it is painful (at least) and often impossible. *This is why this process is taking so much time: we have to be sure we’re doing the right thing. But, sometimes, web developers can’t wait. By shipping a very minimal set of features that allow web developers to build libraries around low-level features, we can see what works and what doesn’t work and take that in consideration when designing the final version of the API. This helps creating better in-browser features, and it also helps shipping early implementations faster. This approach is called prollyfilling. *In short, an extensible web leaves more room for short-term innovation and experiments, without compromising a stable and harmonious future.* In case you didn’t already, I invite you to read (and sign) the manifesto, and look at some of the links provided from there. In the name of this community group, François REMY Visit website <http://www.w3.org/community/nextweb/2013/06/11/the-extensible-web-manifesto/> Sent via feedly <http://bit.ly/SA6Efh> // A news reader for creative minds. Also, sorry if this message is brief it's sent from my mobile device. Cheers -- Si. PS I check my email at 08:00 <x-apple-data-detectors://26> and 17:00 GMT <x-apple-data-detectors://27>. If you require a faster response please include the word 'fast' in the subject line. ======================= Simon Harper My Business Card - http://simon.harper.name/about/card/ Schedule a Meeting - http://doodle.com/simon.harper.name University of Manchester (UK) Web Ergonomics Lab - Information Management Group http://wel.cs.manchester.ac.uk <http://wel.cs.manchester.ac.uk/> -- Si. PS I check my email at 08:00 and 17:00 GMT. If you require a faster response please include the word 'fast' in the subject line. ======================= Simon Harper My Business Card - http://simon.harper.name/about/card/ Schedule a Meeting - http://doodle.com/simon.harper.name University of Manchester (UK) Web Ergonomics Lab - Information Management Group http://wel.cs.manchester.ac.uk
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2013 08:18:05 UTC