Fwd: Re: Update to definitions

ATtached is greg's proposal


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Update to definitions
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 09:43:44 -0800
From: Greg Lowney <gcl-0039@access-research.org>
To: Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>

Hi Jeanne,

Here is one of the draft documents describing my criteria; these are my 
original work, although I think I may have emailed them before, and I 
know I tried to go over them on one of the conference calls only to get 
told they were tool complicated--but I think that's because when hearing 
them, the sample questions blend in with the main item titles. I was 
planning on (a) creating a summary by taking out the sample questions, 
leaving just the bolded titles and italicized endings, and (b) fixing 
what I see is unclear writing in #2 about the fact that anything that 
inconveniences others should ideally be a user option, and if it is it 
should not automatically be downgraded to recommendation.

I'll call you in just a few minutes.

      Greg

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Update to definitions
From: Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>
To: Greg Lowney <gcl-0039@access-research.org>
Date: 5/9/2013 7:57 AM
> Hi Greg!
>
> I'm working on the updated definitions of levels (last moment, sorry) and I wondered where you got your list. When I first read it, I assumed it was from the big spreadsheet we did, but now that I am looking at the spreadsheet, I see that it is quite different.
>
> Do you have time for quick call to discuss?  I'm working from home and best reached on my cell 617-584-4545.
>
> Thanks,
>
> jeanne