- From: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 12:21:20 -0500
- To: WAI-ua <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+=z1WkDB3ufV8vGdDHxo7Sr=8yieMdGhvmBfuDBA4FgRnhZww@mail.gmail.com>
E Hansen suggestions/edits 4 April 2013, 11:57 Components of UAAG 2.0 Conformance Claims Each component is required unless explicitly cited as “optional.” 1. Claimant name and affiliation. 2. Claimant contact information. 3. Date of the claim. 4. Conformance level (level A, AA, or AA). 5. User agent information: a. Name and manufacturer b. Version number or version range, c. Required patches or updates, human language of the user interface or documentation). d. Include any required configuration changes to the user agent (e.g. ignore author foreground/background color) e. Required plugins or extensions with versions (e.g., mouseless browsing) 6. Platform: Describe the *platform* (software and hardware) on which the user agent relies for conformance. a. Platform hardware 1. Key hardware components or limitations (e.g., minimum screen size: 2-inch diagonal, audio output device [What about input devices]). 2. Other information about the platform hardware (e.g., name and manufacturer and version number of the hardware components) b. Platform software (mandatory only if there is platform software) 1. Name and manufacturer 2. Version of key software components (e.g., operating system, other software environment) 3. Any required configuration changes to the platform (e.g., turn on sticky keys) 4. Operating system(s) (e.g., Windows 8, Android 4.0+, iOS 5.0+, GNOME 2) 5. Other software environment (Java SE 7+, Eclipse 3.7+) "Host" web browser - relevant when the conforming user agent is web-based (e.g., Firefox 14+, Safari 7.0+) 7. Range of web content technologies rendered a. Web content technologies rendered. The claimant must identify all web content technologies the rendering of which is relied upon to meet the claimed conformance level. By including a web content technology, the claimant is asserting that the user agent meets the requirements of UAAG 2.0 (at the claimed level) during the rendering of web content using that web content technology. Note: Web content technologies may be a combination of constituent web content technologies. For example, an image technology (e.g. PNG) might be listed together with a markup technology (e.g. HTML) since web content in the markup technology[egh1] <#_msocom_1> is used make web content in the image technology. b. Content technologies not relied upon (optional). The claimant may optionally identify one or more web content technologies that are not relied upon to meet the claimed conformance level. If the claimant chooses to exercise this option and to cite one or more technologies not relied on, the description must carefully distinguish between (a) technologies that are supported and (b) technologies that are not supported. [I did not want to rule out the possibility that the user agent may support a web technology yet not rely on it. I am not positive yet that this is a real possibility.] 7. Declarations: Provide, for each success criterion, a declaration of either (a) whether or not the success criterion has been satisfied or (b) a declaration that the success criterion is not applicable and a rationale for why not. Refer to Note ABC for further information on determining which success criteria may not be applicable. 8. Platform: Include the name, manufacturer, and version information of operating system <http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/UAAG20/#def-operating-system>, operating environment, and/or application on which the user agent is being hosted. (Example platforms <http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/UAAG20/#def-platform> could include Microsoft Windows an operating system, Gnome and the Java Runtime Environment as operating environments, Eclipse as a hosting IDE, Mozilla Firefox for OS X as a hosting web browser, and Samsung's version of Google Android for the Galaxy S III as a combination of customized operating system and hardware. All would include specific version numbers or ranges.) Include any required configuration changes to the platform (e.g.a web-based browser will conform when run on Firefox with the Mouseless Browsing extension) and any relevant hardware limitations (e.g. minimum screen size, audio output). ------------------------------ [egh1] <#_msoanchor_1>Not sure I understand this. It seems to blur the division between platform and web technologies rendered. I find this somewhat confusing. -- Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator & Webmaster Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired 1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756 voice 512.206.9315 fax: 512.206.9264 http://www.tsbvi.edu/ "We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964
Received on Thursday, 4 April 2013 17:21:48 UTC