- From: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:04:07 -0500
- To: "'UAWG list'" <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Interesting UA add-on. Have just read about it. Will install and test a bit. Kim, might be interesting to see if it adds or detracts from voice-input browsing. Jim -----Original Message----- From: webaim-forum-bounces@list.webaim.org [mailto:webaim-forum-bounces@list.webaim.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Dunphy Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 2:31 PM To: WebAIM Discussion List Subject: [WebAIM] looking for insights about eSSENTIAL Accessibility I've recently been asked to evaluate an Assistive Browser software solution and aside from my own personal thoughts (see below), I'd appreciate any additional perspectives. >From a site development point of view nothing really changes - a site still needs to be built properly and with accessibility in mind. This software is intended to be another way to get the information to the people that need them - in this case, people with mobility impairments would stand to benefit best. Is anyone familiar with and if so, share their experience using the eSSENTIAL Accessibility browser from http://www.essentialaccessibility.com ? In general, anything that increases accessibility awareness is a good thing. That said, it's my personal opinion that the install process plus learning curve associated with changing default options could be counter productive to end users that could benefit the most. Were I a low-tech user that required the use Assistive Technology due to mobility issues, I believe I'd be completely overwhelmed with this software. My opinion of the site that encouraged me to use this technology would also be affected negatively. Would you agree? As an able bodied user I may be missing the obvious so I would love any & all feedback. Comments, insights, opinions & criticism are all welcome. Regards, Patrick Dunphy > _______________________________________________ To manage your subscription, visit http://list.webaim.org/ Address list messages to webaim-forum@list.webaim.org
Received on Tuesday, 1 June 2010 17:04:52 UTC