- From: david poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 12:57:11 -0400
- To: "Jim Allan" <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
I'm not sure the word important is clear enough. On May 7, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Jim Allan wrote: #69. (Re 4.1.8) Require single keystroke OR key combination, etc.: Change the text from "are available in a single keystroke" to "are available using a single keystroke, key combination, or sequence of unmodified keystrokes". The dictionaries I found online all define keystroke as a single depression of a single key, and there are clearly not enough available single keystrokes to assign to all of the important commands. (The reason I also include "or sequence of unmodified keys" is because of the StickyKeys feature which allows the user to emulate a key combination using sequential unmodified keystrokes.) Since this is only Level AA it's not high priority, but without a change such as this it would not be accomplishing its goal AND it would make Level AA compliance extremely difficult. (THAT CAN BE MEMORIZED AND ENTERED WITHOUT CHECKING INTERMEDIATE RESULTS, e.g. F10,F,O is OK for File->Open, but F10,Down,Down,Enter is not?) (Priority: 2 Medium) ------------------------------------------ Propose: 4.1.8 Important Command Functions: Important command functions (e.g. related to navigation, display, content, information management, etc.) are available using a single keystroke, key combination, or sequence of unmodified keystrokes. (Level AA) Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator & Webmaster Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired 1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756 voice 512.206.9315 fax: 512.206.9264 http://www.tsbvi.edu/ "We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964
Received on Thursday, 7 May 2009 16:57:52 UTC