- From: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:51:36 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
>From http://www.w3.org/2009/04/16-ua-minutes.html
- DRAFT -
User Agent Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference
16 Apr 2009
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Jallan to write CG about review of UAAG20 [recorded in
http://www.w3.org/2009/04/16-ua-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: JS to update the glossary with the definition of input
configuration [recorded in
http://www.w3.org/2009/04/16-ua-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: sharper to investigate / review interactive and enabled for
contradictions. [recorded in
http://www.w3.org/2009/04/16-ua-minutes.html#action03]
Attendees
Present
Harper_Simon, Ford_Kelly, Allan_Jim, Spellman_Jeanne, Patch_Kim,
Richards_Jan, Swan_Henny
Regrets
Hakkinen_Mark
Chair
Allan_James, Ford_Kelly
Scribe
Harper_Simon
Contents
* Topics
1. Logistics (Regrets, agenda requests, comments)?
2. Update scribing schedule
3. New Member
4. Generating UAAG comments
5. Survey results http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/36791/20090331/
6. WAI-ARIA last call review http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/
* Summary of Action Items
<trackbot> Date: 16 April 2009
<scribe> scribe: Harper_Simon
<scribe> ScribeNick: sharper
<kford> Hey Simon.
<scribe> meeting: User Agent Working Group Telecon - 16 April 2009
Logistics (Regrets, agenda requests, comments)?
<jeanne> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/36791/20090414/
Update scribing schedule
New Member
JA: Welcome Kim Patch as a new Member
KP: Introductions and brief background
All: Introductions and professional backgrounds
Generating UAAG comments
JA: New working draft went out for comments
http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2009/UAAG20-20090121-ED/
... No Comments to date
HS: Blogged and Twittered already
<Henny> http://www.iheni.com/uaag-needs-you/
JR: Will announce at Authoring tools event
SH: Will Announce at the W4A Conference Next Week
<AllanJ> ACTION: Jallan to write CG about review of UAAG20 [recorded in
http://www.w3.org/2009/04/16-ua-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-179 - Write CG about review of UAAG20 [on Jim
Allan - due 2009-04-23].
JA: If HS related to WASP - would anyone be interested there?
... Anymore thoughts on this?
... to KF will MicroSoft be commenting?
KF: yes
HS: Likewise Opera - many comments - but more questions.
Survey results http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/36791/20090331/
<AllanJ> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/36791/20090415/
<AllanJ> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/36791/20090331/results
Focus on input configuration
Accept 2 / 1 More / 2 Neutral
MH: "Input configurations may be affected by author-specified bindings
(e.g., through the accesskey attribute of HTML 4 [HTML4])."
Is this a statement of what has happened, and should continue, OR should we
say that such is not a good thing?
"Input configurations should not be affected by author-specified bindings
(e.g., through the accesskey attribute of HTML 4 [HTML4]) without first
notifying the user."
JR: is in glossary, is a statement of fact that authors can set keyboard
bindings
JA: true - any more thoughts?
KF: I agree with JR
... talk about this in some places
JA: Addressed elsewhere
... Still missing the negotiating keybindings
... Should we also mention JavaScript - or leave it as there may be many
otherways to do this
KF: as it is, this is one illustration, could be many more.
KF + JA: so leave it this way
RESOLUTION: as The set of "bindings" between user agent functionalities and
user interface input mechanisms (e.g., menus, buttons, keyboard keys, and
voice commands). The default input configuration is the set of bindings the
user finds after installation of the software. Input configurations may be
affected by author-specified bindings (e.g., through the accesskey attribute
of HTML 4 [HTML4]).
<AllanJ> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/36791/20090415/results
<jeanne> ACTION: JS to update the glossary with the definition of input
configuration [recorded in
http://www.w3.org/2009/04/16-ua-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-180 - Update the glossary with the definition of
input configuration [on Jeanne Spellman - due 2009-04-23].
JA: Proposal - interactive element, non-interactive element
5 Accept / 1 More
JR: (More) Comment - leaves out non-interactive
JA: (Accept) Comment - should programmatic enablement be 'scripting'?
<AllanJ> SH: if we use scripting, are we confining to a specific language
<JR> Elements that by specification or programming have associated behaviors
....
<kford> +1 to JR.
SH: That sounds good
+1 to JR
<AllanJ> +1
<Henny> +1
<jeanne> +1
<KimPatch> +1
JA: Junk the 'non-interactive element' part of the title
... any Objections?
<kford> +1 to removal
JS: Good - clarifys
+1 to removal
RESOLUTION: remove on-interactive element to make 'interactive element' NOT
interactive element, non-interactive element
RESOLUTION: to -- Elements that by specification or programming have
associated behaviours to be executed or carried out as a result of user or
programmatic interaction. (e.g., in HTML 4 [HTML4] the interactive elements
include: links, image maps, form elements, elements with a value for the
longdesc attribute, and elements with event handlers explicitly associated
with them).
<scribe> ACTION: sharper to investigate / review interactive and enabled for
contradictions. [recorded in
http://www.w3.org/2009/04/16-ua-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-181 - Investigate / review interactive and enabled
for contradictions. [on Simon Harper - due 2009-04-23].
WAI-ARIA last call review http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/
<AllanJ> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2009AprJun/0020.html
KP: many standards - will it jump to individual characters or as a word? Big
mix of this - especially with speech I/F
KF: dragon doesn't just use keyboard emulation, uses active accessibility
to.
<AllanJ> s/to. /too
KF: basic c&c can get to the elements, then keyboard as final option.
... concern that ARIA doesn't create a false sense of how easy it will be to
use. More complicated structures induce and expectation of certain
characteristics - which may not be the case.
... hopefully we'll have web ARIA tools kits and add 'their' version of the
tree - expected behaviour is 'key' and not getting this behaviour may mean
we make more barriers
<AllanJ> KF: AT users have higher level of knowledge/expectations of
keyboard interaction with UI elements than ARIA can/may provide and may
confuse users
All: general ARIA conversation.
JA: Comments on the issue at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2009AprJun/0020.html should
be more formal
JS: will find correct way to do this - just need a more formal version -
will answer JA tomorrow - deadline for comments tomorrow.
KF: these will be our (the groups) comments on ARIA - anything else members
need to speak up ASAP
RESOLUTION: These are our (the groups) comments on ARIA - and will be sent
formally ASAP
<AllanJ> SH: two items: web applications, and personalization and UA
implementation
JA: Items for next week - We have been doing yeoman's work on the glossary.
While the glossary
> is important, it is time (beginning next week) to review the open action
> items related to video and alternative content.
JS: UBIWeb Notes mentioned in WAI group - team would like us to comment so
they can hear them.
<AllanJ>
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-UWA-personalization-roadmap-20090409/
<AllanJ> mobile best practices - http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/
<AllanJ> Relationship between Mobile Web Best Practices (MWBP) and Web
Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/Accessibility/drafts/ED-mwb
p-wcag- 20090218/
<AllanJ>
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/Accessibility/drafts/ED-mwb
p-wcag-20090218/
Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator & Webmaster
Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
voice 512.206.9315 fax: 512.206.9264 http://www.tsbvi.edu/
"We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964
Received on Thursday, 16 April 2009 18:54:35 UTC