- From: Simon Harper <simon.harper@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:26:50 +0100
- To: UAWG list <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
I've been Looking at comprehensiveness across all principles in a top down manner. wrt principle 2 and Assistive Technology - maybe I'm missing something - but can someone tell me why we don't just say 'other technologies'? Why are we limiting this to AT? Why aren't we say expose your interfaces / APIs / and event handlers to other technologies? In addition is there any reason why we can't just make sure event handlers are exposed to other technologies and leave 4.2 to third party development? Cheers Si. ======================= Simon Harper University of Manchester (UK) Human Centred Web Lab: http://hcw.cs.manchester.ac.uk My Site: http://hcw.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/harper/ My Diary (iCal): http://hcw.cs.manchester.ac.uk/diaries/SimonHarper.ics +----------------------[ NEW & INTERESTING ]--------------------------------------+ ASSETS 2008 . 13-15 Oct 2008 . http:// www.sigaccess.org/assets08 +----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------+
Received on Friday, 3 October 2008 09:27:16 UTC