Re: (PFWG) ACTION-211 Query re: SVG Request for @order for Access Module

Hi, Shane-

Shane McCarron wrote (on 8/9/08 11:10 AM):
> Okay - I have integrated a slightly changed version of this.  It is in 
> the latest editor's snapshot. 

Thanks, looks great.

I do have one nitpick:

"Also note: When processing an invalid document, if there are duplicate 
ids, element groups based on targetid values may contain multiple 
values, just like those of targetrole values."

Could be:

"Also note: When processing a document with duplicate ids, element 
groups based on targetid values may contain multiple values, just like 
those of targetrole values."

This is more descriptive of the actual condition.  There is no need to 
point out that a document with duplicate ids may be invalid; if the 
Access module is used in a language where duplicate ids are allowed, 
then that document would not be invalid, so making this change to the 
spec ensures the broad applicability of the Access module across 
languages, and is good future-proofing.

Regards-
-Doug Schepers
W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF

Received on Saturday, 9 August 2008 19:20:37 UTC