- From: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:17:38 -0500
- To: "'David Poehlman'" <poehlman1@comcast.net>, "'Jan Richards'" <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>, "'WAI-UA list'" <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Comments inline prefaced by <jim> Jim -----Original Message----- David Poehlman wrote on April 3, 2008: I have three thoughts and would like discussion if relevant: 1> Where do we go after 2.0? <jim> Hmm, good question. I propose adding the following to the list of Deliverables UAAG 2.0 is a Recommendation: Developing test suites for user agents that render HTML and CSS. Developing test suites for user agents that render audio, video and animations.</jim> 2> What if section 508...? <jim> The formal report from the TEITAC committee is now in the hands of the Access Board. Several members of the working group were part of that committee and tracked issues related to application and content accessibility. As we move through UAAG 2.0 development we will address any harmonization issues as they arise. </jim> 3> in voting, can we have for with comments? and also there is no mention of logging objections. <jim> The voting is for, against, or abstain. Any comments and objections will be noted in the minutes of the vote.</jim> Thanks! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Richards" <jan.richards@utoronto.ca> To: "WAI-UA list" <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:16 PM Subject: Draft UAWG Charter A draft charter for the UAWG is available at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2008/draft_uawg_charter_20mar08.html Please send any comments to the UAWG mailing list. Cheers, Jan
Received on Friday, 11 April 2008 14:21:17 UTC