- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:58:37 -0500
- To: WAU-ua <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Some thoughts... - ATAG 2.0 combines 12.1 and 12.2 12.1 Provide accessible documentation (P1) - Maybe we should say Double-A of WCAG 1.0 or WCAG 2.0? - What about promoting the accessibility of installation codes and documentation to be a requirement. 12.2 Provide documentation of accessibility features (P1) - ok 12.3 Provide documentation of default bindings (P1) - Strange "Sufficient technique" - it says nothing about this checkpoint but instead refers to another. - otherwise ok 12.4 Provide documentation of changes between versions (P2) - ok 12.5 Provide dedicated accessibility section (P2) -ok, although I'm not sure how I feel about a centralized section. If the documentation has a section on "Images" and a section on "Accessibility" then documentation on "alt text" would either have to be duplicated or be in one place but not the other. Cheers, Jan
Received on Monday, 11 December 2006 13:58:59 UTC