- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:03:25 +1100
- To: "Jim Allan" <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>, jimallan@tsb1.tsbvi.edu, WAU-ua <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
- Cc: "Jan Richards" <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:34:55 +1100, Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu> wrote:
> Please send RSVP or additional agenda items to the list.
Likely regrets. I am in Australia where that is not a civilised hour
(given that I have to work late in the evening to keep up with Europe).
> Agenda
> New Topics:
> 1. Review issues related to UAAG and SVGT from message
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Dec/0021
> What is UAWG response?
from their message:
[[[
Regarding your comment on the standardization of the equivalence of
keyboard events, we feel that this is something that different user
agents will need to map differently - i.e., it should be user agent
dependent. As such, we don't feel that it should be standardized,
particularly in the SVG Tiny 1.2 spec.
]]]
I don't think that leaving this for user agents is enough. The spec must
be clear that there are real problems where authors use mouse-based events
that cannot be fired by the keyboard or vice versa, since while User
Agents *may* do something to alleviate the problem there is no
specification they can follow, and no guarantee that they do it in any
case.
> 2. SVG (embedded object) related topic: Scenario: have a page with
> embedded
> svg, user cannot focus on svg in browser using the keyboard (svg object
> is
> not focusable), so user cannot use any commands or functions available
> within svg object.
This is an issue on the Compound Document Formats work really, not SVG
itself.
Cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile chaals@opera.com
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
Peek into the kitchen: http://snapshot.opera.com/
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2005 02:04:13 UTC