- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:03:25 +1100
- To: "Jim Allan" <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>, jimallan@tsb1.tsbvi.edu, WAU-ua <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
- Cc: "Jan Richards" <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:34:55 +1100, Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu> wrote: > Please send RSVP or additional agenda items to the list. Likely regrets. I am in Australia where that is not a civilised hour (given that I have to work late in the evening to keep up with Europe). > Agenda > New Topics: > 1. Review issues related to UAAG and SVGT from message > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Dec/0021 > What is UAWG response? from their message: [[[ Regarding your comment on the standardization of the equivalence of keyboard events, we feel that this is something that different user agents will need to map differently - i.e., it should be user agent dependent. As such, we don't feel that it should be standardized, particularly in the SVG Tiny 1.2 spec. ]]] I don't think that leaving this for user agents is enough. The spec must be clear that there are real problems where authors use mouse-based events that cannot be fired by the keyboard or vice versa, since while User Agents *may* do something to alleviate the problem there is no specification they can follow, and no guarantee that they do it in any case. > 2. SVG (embedded object) related topic: Scenario: have a page with > embedded > svg, user cannot focus on svg in browser using the keyboard (svg object > is > not focusable), so user cannot use any commands or functions available > within svg object. This is an issue on the Compound Document Formats work really, not SVG itself. Cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile chaals@opera.com hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk Peek into the kitchen: http://snapshot.opera.com/
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2005 02:04:13 UTC