- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: 20 Feb 2003 10:57:00 -0500
- To: Catherine Laws <claws@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 09:37, Catherine Laws wrote: > > Jon, > > I have reviewed the test suites for Checkpoints 1.1 and 1.2 and have the > following comments/issues: Thanks Cathy! > > General test suite comments: > > - If we have written sample testcases to test compliance with specific > checkpoints, do you want us to send them to someone, or are your students > at the University of Illinois or Colin Koteles writing all the test cases? I for one support contributions to the test suite. The UAWG does not yet have a process set up for handling them. This issue is addressed in guidelines 7 [1] of "QA Framework: Operational Guidelines", which is currently in last call. This is a good topic for discussion at upcoming meetings. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-ops/#Gd-plan-for-ts-transfer > - Have your students at the University of Illinois created a list of > comments about the test suites? If so, is that list published somewhere for > review? If not, could it be? Jon, it sounds like we could use an issues list for the test suite, linked from the test suite home page (and the UAWG home page). _ Ian -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 20 February 2003 10:57:43 UTC