- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 08:54:42 +0000
- To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: Matt May <mcmay@w3.org>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Ian, The recommendation is there, we seem agreed that the implementation is not difficult, however the reality is that no one knows of a browser that exhibits this behaviour. As stated to wai-ig, it is not so much this example as the 'process' that may be faulty. W3C groups are recommendation focused, and implementation is left to bug reports. Where is the discussion group that draws attention to a failure in understanding? It is very hard to imagine how this slipped through the net*, and yet it did. People with severe learning difficulties have individual and particular needs. We will need excellent channels of communication in order to implement recommendations to their benefit. thanks Jonathan *apologies this may be a UK soccer/football expression referring to something that was overseen. On Thursday, January 23, 2003, at 10:12 PM, Ian B. Jacobs wrote: > Jonathan Chetwynd wrote: >> Matt, >> not sure if you are following this thread at wai-ig. >> in any case, my concern is that if a UA does some action on mouse >> event, it should be/is a standard that this is possible via an >> alternative input such as keyboard. As I think you will realise, I'm >> unclear as to why you mention HTML. could you please explain? > > Jonathan, > > UAAG 1.0 satisfies your requirement: it requires that *any operation > of the user agent* be do-able through the keyboard. > > - Ian > > > -- > Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs > Tel: +1 718 260-9447 >
Received on Saturday, 25 January 2003 03:54:23 UTC