- From: by way of Harvey Bingham <jmillea@EDUCATIONAU.EDU.AU>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 14:58:21 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
The Learning Federation metadata application profile uses learner profiles to describe how a learning object meets accessibility checkpoints. Jen -----Original Message----- From: Liddy Nevile [mailto:Liddy.Nevile@MOTILE.NET] Sent: Saturday, 14 September 2002 8:25 AM To: DC-ACCESSIBILITY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: DC2002 in Florence in October Hello. At the forthcoming DC2002 meeting in Florence, we are hoping to shape some proposals for a DC-accessibility element. This online Interest Group has not engaged in a lot of discussion but I believe there is nevertheless significant interest in an element that will convey important accessibility information. Am I right? There is work on-going to find a suitable way to represent the accessibility of a resource or service and also to represent conformance to accessibility standards. As the standards are developing, particularly because their use has now revealed interesting data about how they can affect the implementation of accessibility, the ideas have been changing. But the technologies have been developing as well, as many of the tools required for increasing accessibility are emerging. The issues that need to be dealt with include: * what should be available about the accessibility of a resource or service * how should this information be represented, encoded * where should this information be made available * who should be responsible for providing this information Work has been on-going on how to categorise the needs of users, whether these needs are the result of disabilities or circumstances. The IMS Global Project is close to releasing its LIP for people with disabilities - Learner Information Profile This profile is based on extensive work done in Canada and at the UK Open University. It helps organise the information that is necessary to cater for all sorts of access devices that might be in use. It follows a model that has been adopted in the UK where the Open University can have a profile of its enrolled students but not all users want others to control or have access to their profiles. There are still outstanding issues such as: * where and how should such a profile be used. There are different answers depending upon the context, it seems. * how should such a profile be encoded so that it can be used for all relevant purposes, including discovery and content transformation. * how does such a profile relate to the profile of a resource or service being sought by a user. W3C Accessibility Working Group members are participating in the DC2002 Accessibility sessions in order to support the dialogue between DCMI and W3C Accessibility with respect to the proposed DC element. Please indicate if you are able to attend these sessions or contribute to the discussion by sending your thoughts to this list in the next few weeks. Liddy
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2002 15:00:53 UTC