- From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:52:09 -0600
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
- Cc: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, asgilman@iamdigex.net, rayw@netscape.com, plh@w3.org, lehors@us.ibm.com, shane@aptest.com, gleng@freedomscientific
The following is my summary of the UAAG teleconference on the 18th. Please let me know if people have a different view of my conclusions or additional information. Thanks, Jon 1. Resolved There will be two boolean tests available on a node for event handlers. One to test if a node will respond to a particular event (node is in the event path) and one to test if the event handler is actually on this specific node. Action DOM: DOM working group will return with the specifications for UAAG review 2. There is a proposal from Ray for getting a list of event listeners and descriptions from the DOM. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002JanMar/0020.html Action DOM: DOM working group will return with specifications for UAAG review Action UAAG/PF: Review Rays's draft for possible usage problems by AT 3. HTML working group with PF needs to continue wouking on: a. Device independent event mapping b. A means to define and associate descriptions of events with event handlers (see proposal by Ray in 2). Action: HTML and PF
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2002 14:51:32 UTC