- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 16:08:15 -0400
- To: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
I agree with the new label set. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Gunderson" <jongund@uiuc.edu> To: <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:59 PM Subject: Proposal for Checkpoints 1.2, 9.5 and 9.6 The following checkpoints are all related to the problem of authors not using accessible design practices: Checkpoint 1.2 Activate event handlers Checkpoint 9.5 No events on focus change Checkpoint 9.6 Show event handlers The list discussion suggested that these were important requirements to keep with one vote to remove the requirements altogether. PROPOSAL: We create a new label called "repair" that would include this set of checkpoints and the following checkpoints: Checkpoint 2.2 Provide text view. (P1) Checkpoint 2.7 Repair missing content. (P2) Checkpoint 2.8 No repair text. (P3) These checkpoints I think are all related to repairing poorly authored web pages. The advantage of a "repair" label is that we can keep the requirements, but still provide a means for user agents to conform even if they do not implement these specific requirements. Jon Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services MC-574 College of Applied Life Studies University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign 1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820 Voice: (217) 244-5870 Fax: (217) 333-0248 E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2002 16:09:07 UTC