- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 15:30:48 -0400
- To: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>
- CC: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Jon Gunderson wrote: > There are enough people to have a quorum at a meeting this week on > Thursday. The following people said they could attend: > Tim Lacy > Jon Gunderson > Jim Allan > David Poehlman > Harvey Bingham > > More are welcome! I will be there. _ Ian > We will be discussing the following editorial and clarification issues: > Issue 544: Should we delete requirements re: fee links from UAAG 1.0 > since not really part of Web today? > Issue 543: [Clarification] 11.5: Forward/back one viewport for 2d > renderings only? > Issue 542: [Clarification] 11.5: What does "refresh" mean, notably in > light of usage in 3.5 > Issue 541: [Clarification] 11.5 (default binding requirements): Moving > UI focus to address box sufficient > Issue 540: [Editorial] 10.3 (indicate rendering progress): Clarify that > not about download progress, but position of viewport > Issue 539: 11.6 (user profiles): Must the user profile be portable? Does > saving configurations suffice? > Issue 538: [Editorial] Make checkpoint requirements distinct from > exceptions, sufficient conditions > Issue 536: [Editorial] 9.7: Title is too forceful and doesn't > communicate key bit of checkpoint > Issue 535: 9.4 (restore history): Must consider UA cache availability > Issue 534: [Clarification] 9.3 (Move content focus): Clarify that "each > element" refers to elements in set defined in provision 1 > -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Monday, 6 May 2002 15:32:48 UTC