- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 15:42:04 -0500
- To: User Agent Working group list <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "George Kerscher" <kerscher@montana.com> To: "'Jo Miller'" <jm@bendingline.com>; <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 3:23 PM Subject: RE: linking to transcripts of audio files Dear All, You may want to check out the use of SMIL and the navigation features developed by the Digital Accessible Information SYstem (DAISY) Consortium. find more at: http://www.daisy.org The navigation model for linking into audio content is very powerful. This work is being continued in concert with NISO and you can learn more at: http://www.loc.gov/nls/z3986 This same navigation model has been introduced to the Open eBook Forum and is expected to be incorporated in the version 2 of their specifications for eBooks. Hope this helps. Best George -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jo Miller Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 8:26 AM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: linking to transcripts of audio files I received an interesting question from a colleague who has a large number of audio files and text transcripts on his site (see below). I am not aware of a convention for abbreviating links to transcripts, but perhaps one of you is. (In my experience, a plain-text link called "Transcript" is most common.) [discussion of D-links] >We are considering using a similar type of link to provide access to >audio narration transcripts. Is there a standard convention for >indicating such a link? We thought of using [AT]. Of course, we would >explain the meaning of [AT] ... -- Jo Miller jm@bendingline.com
Received on Thursday, 4 April 2002 15:42:34 UTC