- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 08:29:40 -0500
- To: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>
- CC: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Jon Gunderson wrote: > > Discussion > 1. Charter update Jon, I have nothing new to report on charter progress. Although I spent some time with Judy at the AC meeting last week, we did not make any progress on the question of rechartering. > 4. Test Suites I attended the QA meeting in Brussels (minutes not yet available). We talked about QA as a whole at W3C, but did not get into details about a specific test suite mechanism. However, it was good to share with the WG our initial experience in this area, and to meet Lofton Henderson and others on the WG. While I still think that test suites are an important complement to UAAG 1.0, my current expectation is that for the next couple of weeks, the details of rechartering will take priority over active development of test suites. > Open Action Items > IJ: Add to "How to Evaluate" information about "how to rate whether a user > agent satisfies a checkpoint" > Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001OctDec/0054.html Done. > IJ: Add definition of user agent while an independent document. > Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001OctDec/0054.html Done. Please refer to updated evaluation document: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/10/eval - Ian -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2001 08:32:03 UTC