- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 17:34:42 -0500
- To: "User Agent Working group list" <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Here's the text of the attachment for those who cannot process it. TO: NISO Voting Members (Representatives and Alternates) All other interested parties FROM: Michael Moodie, Chair of NISO Standards Committee AQ DATE: November 1, 2001 RE: Proposed NISO Standard: Z39.86-200x Version 1.0.0 File Specifications for the Digital Talking Book Attached for your immediate review and ballot is the proposed American National Standard File Specifications for the Digital Talking Book (DTB), Z39.86-200x, Version 1.0.0, developed by NISO Standards Committee AQ. This proposed standard is being circulated for ballot: November 1- December 17, 2001. This standard represents the results of over four years of effort by an international team representing a broad range of stakeholders dedicated to providing alternative format materials to print-disabled readers. It is built on specifications and needs formulated by blind and visually impaired users, who were heavily involved in every aspect of the development effort. ABOUT THE DTB STANDARD The DTB standard is important because it makes possible a powerful, flexible reading system that easily adapts to different types of documents and different user needs. A DTB is a collection of electronic files arranged to present information to the target population via alternative media. These media can include: human or synthetic speech, refreshable Braille, or visual display,(e.g., large print). When these files are created and assembled into a DTB in compliance with this standard, a wide range of features can be offered: rapid, flexible navigation; bookmarking and highlighting; keyword searching; spelling of words on demand; user control over the presentation of selected items (e.g., footnotes, page numbers, etc.). These features enable readers with visual and physical disabilities to access the information in DTBs flexibly and efficiently. This functionality also benefits persons with learning or reading disabilities, allowing these readers to receive this information through multiple senses. DTBs using this Standard can include content in text form, marked-up with an XML element set developed for the DTB application. This DTBook element set will likely have wide-application beyond digital talking books as it was designed to enable the production of documents in a variety of accessible formats. BACKGROUND RE: DEVELOPMENT OF THE DTB This Standard is a result of many years of work and much collaboration. The full committee met eleven times across the United States and Canada and smaller working groups met countless times in person and via conference calls and email. Wherever possible, standards or specifications developed by other groups were used. This draft standard incorporates or references many existing specifications, in whole or in part, including several developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and one from the Open eBook Forum (OEBF). A number of Standards Committee members participate on working groups of other standards bodies, including the W3C's Synchronized Multimedia Working Group and the OEBF's Publication Structure Working Group (PSWG). Cooperation was especially fruitful with the latter group. Our mutual interest in navigation mechanisms resulted in the PSWG adopting the basic features of a navigation control file developed for the DTB. In turn, the PSWG added enhancements that were incorporated into the NISO standard. One area of cooperation worthy of special mention is the Committee's collaboration with the DAISY Consortium, an international body established to develop specifications and tools for the production and delivery of DTBs. When we began our work, there was fear that we were trying to displace the DAISY group. DAISY was invited to provide representatives to Committee AQ and did so, greatly expanding our international contacts. Very soon, it became evident that sharing our resources would benefit both groups. We agreed that Committee AQ would focus on an XML-based standard that would provide capabilities not possible in their HTML-based specifications. The expertise DAISY established in creating simpler DTB specifications was invaluable to the NISO work. As stated in the acknowledgments section of the standard: "It is no exaggeration to state that without their groundbreaking efforts and their ongoing contributions to Committee work, this standard would not exist in anything like its current level of sophistication." The Standards Committee recommends that this standard be in a continuous maintenance status. Given the pace of technological change and the complexity of this document, modifications and enhancements will need to be made on an ongoing basis in as efficient a manner as possible. EARLY IMPLEMENTATIONS There is strong support for this Standard. At this time one U.S. Braille translation software package has implemented a facility that imports DTBook documents and automatically translates and formats them in Grade-2 Braille. It is expected that similar automated processes will be developed for converting marked-up documents into large print formats and for rendering DTBook documents in Braille, synthetic speech, and large print "on the fly." Two U.S. agencies, the National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped of the Library of Congress and the American Printing House for the Blind, have developed prototype DTB players and sample DTBs to test the key features requested by users. The Danish National Library for the Blind has built two production tools for creating DTBs. The Danish tools can expedite XML markup using the DTBook tag set, and, building on a tagged file, create a synthetic speech recording of the document, complete with the required administrative files. These implementations were created to interim versions of the draft DTB standard and now await formal approval of the standard so they can be finalized. CONCLUSION Standards Committee AQ is in full support of this standard. It is the Committee's recommendation that the Standard now be approved and recognized as a NISO American National Standard so agencies and companies whose business plans depend on it can move forward with their work. Sincerely yours, Michael Moodie
Received on Friday, 2 November 2001 17:34:55 UTC