- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 09:57:24 -0500
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
- Cc: po@trace.wisc.edu, Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
Hello, I would prefer 17 April 2001 - 8 May 2001, but could do either time frame. I'll make time to review it whenever ya need me. <grin/> good luck y'all and be well, --w At 06:30 PM 3/27/01 , you wrote: >Hello, > >This message is an early request to help the User Agent >Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (UAWG) schedule its third >last call for the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. The >UAWG has not yet decided to return to last call, but we are very >close, and I would like to get a jump on scheduling the review. > >While we will welcome review from all interested groups, we >request review specifically from the following groups: > > Protocols and Formats WG > Web Content Accessibility Guidelines WG > Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines WG > CSS/FP WG > DOM WG > HTML WG > Internationalization WG/IG > Mobile Access > SYMM WG > Voice Browser WG > >Please indicate your commitment to review the document and, if >so, whether either or both of the following three-week review >periods fit your schedules: > > 10 April 2001 - 1 May 2001 > 17 April 2001 - 8 May 2001 > >The W3C Advisory Committee meeting is scheduled for 30 April - 1 >May (in Hong Kong), and WWW10 is scheduled for 1 - 5 May. I >recognize that these scheduled meetings may make it more >difficult for you to schedule a review. But then again, they may >not. > >DEADLINE: 5 April 2001 > >By 5 April, please send email to w3c-wai-ua@w3.org >(archives publicly visible) indicating your commitment to review >the upcoming last call document and your preferred review period. >If neither review period works for you because of the meetings >in Hong Kong, please let us know. Even if you don't intend >to review the document, we request a reply stating this. > >Thank you, > > - Ian > >------- >History >------- > >10 Mar 2000: UAAG 1.0. becomes Proposed Recommendation > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2000JanMar/0022 > >23 Oct 2000: 113 issues later, UAAG 1.0 returns to second last call > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2000OctDec/0058 > >Five months and almost 150 issues later, the User Agent >Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (UAWG) is almost ready to >announce a third last call for UAAG 1.0. > >--------- >Resources >--------- > >UAWG home page: > http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/ > >Latest Working Group draft (public): 23 March 2001 draft > http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/WD-UAAG10-20010323/ > > Note: The document is not expected to change substantially > between now and the expected return to last call. > >Second last call issues list: > http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2 > >List of changes to UAAG 1.0: > http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/wai-ua-wd-changes > > Note: The most recent version of UAAG 1.0 is not fundamentally > different than the one reviewed during the second last call. > The document has been substantially clarified, harmonized, > and the conformance section improved. > >-- >Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs >Tel: +1 831 457-2842 >Cell: +1 917 450-8783 -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative madison, wi usa tel: +1 608 663 6346 /--
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2001 09:58:04 UTC