- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 11:52:48 -0500 (EST)
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- cc: <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
How about "at least a majority of single keys available should have a configurable binding"? Chaals On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Ian Jacobs wrote: Addition: Issue 468 [1]: The "at least a majority" minimal requirement needs review. Refer to Al's email [2]: <BLOCKQUOTE> On the other hand, the requirement of "at least a majority" of the default key bindings would seem to be infeasible in many situations. The group should reconsider this language. If the default key binding defines a full set of single-key plus two full layers of modified-key bindings, then there is _no way_ to reduce a majority of the actions defined [in the default key binding] to single-key bindings. Never mind if there is a one-hand, large-key, or twelve-key device in use. You just can't get there from here. </BLOCKQUOTE> - Ian [1] http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#468 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0399 -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2001 11:52:48 UTC