- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 12:33:21 -0500
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- CC: "Hansen, Eric" <ehansen@ets.org>, "'aaronl@netscape.com'" <aaronl@netscape.com>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > Maybe we could make the conformance stuff cleaner and tighter. > > If the user agent doesn't have to conform to all devices, does it still have > to provide keyboard support. (In other words, is it OK to build a user agent > that conforms for pointing devices but not keyboard?) No, you can't conform if you don't have keyboard support. That's why it says in 3.1: "In order to conform conditionally (or unconditionally) a user agent must be fully operable through the keyboard, and must satisfy the input device requirements of this document for the keyboard." > If so, then the answer is "Yes, you have to do all this". If not then I think > we have a problem. > > But in any case, I don't have a problem with talking about conformance in one > checkpoint only, especially this one... Personally, I would prefer not to. And I still don't think it's necessary if we put a little intro about conformance at the beginning of Section 2. - Ian -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 831 457-2842 Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Sunday, 11 March 2001 12:35:24 UTC