- From: jon gunderson <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 16:15:57 -0600 (CST)
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- cc: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>, Harvey Bingham <hbingham@ACM.org>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Right. A developer can always do more, but for purposes of conformance their would be no requirement to satisfy any Triple-A checkpoints. We always want to encourage developers to do more. Jon On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Ian Jacobs wrote: > Jon Gunderson wrote: > > > > > > > >Clarification for me: the language "at least Level Double-A" means it > > >may also meet some Triple-A checkpoints. > > > > JRG: No it does not, no Triple A checkpoints would need to be met for > > Double-A conformance. > > I believe you are saying the same thing: our checkpoint would > not require that any P3 checkpoints be satisfied, but would not > forbid the UA from satisfying them. > > -Ian > -- > Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs > Tel: +1 831 457-2842 > Cell: +1 917 450-8783 >
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2001 17:16:01 UTC