Re: Repair of Pointer Based Events

At 04:46 PM 2/9/01 -0500, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>I can't speak for PF, but personally I very strongly disagree with the
>reasons for reducing the priority or removing the requirement

For what it's worth - me too!

Proceed with this at your peril.

--
Love.
                 ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE

Received on Friday, 9 February 2001 17:09:29 UTC