- From: Harvey Bingham <hbingham@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 14:20:39 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
- Cc: <clilley@w3.org>
At 2001-01-25 08:42, David Poehlman wrote: >I have a question and a comment: >question: is there an example of a "stylistic effect"? >comment. With pitch supression as it is done through speech synthesis >today, the audio can be much slower than 80 percent and still be >understood. I can get my accent to comprehend quite low rates for >instance at 50 percent. if the voice is pre-recorded and synched then >of course, at low rates much like a recording of any kind, it falls >off the low end of the comprehensibility scale. A further note. many >animations are accompanied by synthesized speech such as in ms agent. >The characters move and speak but we currently have no control over >the motion or the audio. One customization that I would like: Allow my audiogram (hearing loss vs frequency) to shape the algorithm used for rate change without pitch shift. This is significant to me, as I have 60db loss between 2Khz and 3Khz. I would like to have the plosives to be stretched, to reduce their high-frequency harmonics. Does anyone have any experience with this possibility? An analogous technique might be important to shorten low-frequency phonemes (such as changing to a female voice to avoid the too-low fundamental). My customization desire would apply to listening to narrations in SMIL, as we need for digital talking books. Regards/Harvey >...
Received on Thursday, 25 January 2001 14:21:25 UTC