- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 09:53:36 -0500
- To: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>
- CC: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Jon Gunderson wrote: > > Open Action Items > > 1.IJ: Update 8.8 techniques. Not done. > 2.IJ: Put up UAWG meeting page for meeting week of technical plenary. > Link to Plenary meeting page. Not done. > 3.IJ: Follow up with Greg Lowney on issue 389 Done http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0038.html > 4.IJ: (Issue 387) Propose new wording for check point 8.4 reflecting > discussion on 28 November Done http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0032.html > 5.IJ, EH, AG: Propose new definitions forterms in question > (equivalence, text element, etc.) Pending. > 6.IJ: Get wording from Martin for thisrequirement (e.g., "conform", > "implement", etc.) for issue 327 Pending. > 7.IJ: Propose new checkpoints/modifiedcheckpoints for 8.2. Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2000OctDec/0459.html > 8.IJ: Add some more explanation about the difference between 7.3 and7.4. Done (next draft) > 9.IJ: Add to techniques a link to Adobe's accessible PDF information. Done (next draft) > 10.IJ and AG: Revise the applicability provision and send to WG. Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0019.html > 11.IJ: Ask Adobe why this is hard (issue 382) Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0028.html > 12.IJ: 1.4 needs to be re-written in light of changes in checkpoint 1.1. Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0042.html > 13.IJ: Proposed text in 2.1 Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0043.html > 14.IJ: Add a note to 5.8 - content requirements may also apply to user > interface Added to techniques. > 15.IJ: Mention that resizing and overiding absolute values is part of > some specification in section 1.2 Done (next draft) > 16.IJ: Clarify the meaning of system colors Done (next draft). Use the expression "systems and fonts supported by the system" instead (words of reviewer). > 17.IJ: > a) clarify "recognize style" in checkpoints 4.5 > b) need more rational - refer to WCAG - style less important than > other content > c) add note 4.5 - give example of multimedia content that can be > recognized as style Done (next draft) > 18.IJ: Add technique to checkpoint 4.12 to make clear that: > - This includes author-override if speech engine allows. > - This includes whatever granularity offered by speech engine. Done (next draft) > 19.IJ: Add a clarifying note to 4.11 that if you allow independent > control of all sources of audio, you satisfy the checkpoint as well. Done (next draft) The remaining ones not done yet. > 20.IJ: Add a P3 checkpoint on user control of windows that automatically > close > 21.IJ: Add a clarification to checkpoint 4.20 including: > If a viewport includes other viewports, then this requirement > only applies to the topmost viewport. > Add a Note that other requirements still apply to sub-viewports > 22.IJ: Delete second sentence from 4.21 > > 23.IJ: Add to end of first sentence "with which it overlaps" in > checkpoint 4.21 > > 24.IJ: Add "that benefit accessibility" to end of second sentence of > checkpoint 5.8 > > 25.IJ: Put a note in the definition of active element that this does not > include selection. (optional clarification note) > > 26.IJ: Include selection and focus in note after 1.1 as examples of what > must be done. > -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 831 457-2842 Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Monday, 8 January 2001 09:53:39 UTC