Saturday, 31 March 2001
- 31 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available
- Re: Editorial Comments
- Re: Rough comparison of UAAG 1.0 and section 508 requirements for software applications
Friday, 30 March 2001
- Rough comparison of UAAG 1.0 and section 508 requirements for software applications
- RE: [Editorial] Adopt Section 508 definition of "assistive technology"?
- Re: [Editorial] Clarification that 9.3, 9.5, 9.6 apply whatever the input modality conformance chosen
Thursday, 29 March 2001
- Re: Decision to return to last call [Was: Raw minutes from 29 March 2001 UAWG teleconference\
- RE: Raw minutes from 29 March 2001 UAWG teleconference
- Decision to return to last call [Was: Raw minutes from 29 March 2001 UAWG teleconference\
- Raw minutes from 29 March 2001 UAWG teleconference
- RE: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Minority Opinion: Priority of UAAG 12.1 (resent at chair's request)
- Re: [Editorial] Adopt Section 508 definition of "assistive technology"?
- Re: Editorial Comments
- Editorial Comments
- Re: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- last call non-vote
- Re: TECHNIQUES: Checkpoint 9.2, 9.3, 9.5
- RE: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- [Editorial] Clarification that 9.3, 9.5, 9.6 apply whatever the input modality conformance chosen
- Re: [Editorial] Adopt Section 508 definition of "assistive technology"?
- [Editorial] Adopt Section 508 definition of "assistive technology"?
Wednesday, 28 March 2001
- RE: Question for Tim Lacy
- Re: TECHNIQUES: Checkpoint 9.2, 9.3, 9.5
- Re: Executive Summary as Part of UAAG 1.0
- Executive Summary as Part of UAAG 1.0
- RE: Question for Tim Lacy
- Re: control over focus styling in IE
- Re: Responses to Phill Jenkins issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: [Editorial] Two glossary comments
- Re: [Editorial] Two glossary comments
- Scheduling (third) last call review for User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0
- [Editorial] Two glossary comments
- RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 29 March 2001
- AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference for 29 March 2001
- READ and COMMENT!!!! on March 23rd version of UAAG
- Re: [Editorial] Proposed text to explain that checkpoints are interdependent
- Re: Scheduling (third) last call review for User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0
- RE: [Editorial] Proposed text to explain that checkpoints are int erdependent
- Re: Scheduling (third) last call review for User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0
Tuesday, 27 March 2001
- RE: [Editorial] Proposed text to explain that checkpoints are int erdependent
- [Editorial] Proposed text to explain that checkpoints are interdependent
- Re: EDITORIAL: Checkpoint 9.5
- Re: Some editorial and clarification comments on 23 March Draft
- Re: Some editorial and clarification comments on 23 March Draft
- control over focus styling in IE
- TECHNIQUES: Checkpoint 9.2, 9.3, 9.5
- Re: Some editorial and clarification comments on 23 March Draft
- Re: EDITORIAL: Checkpoint 9.5
- EDITORIAL: Checkpoint 9.5
- Some editorial and clarification comments on 23 March Draft
- [Action] Draft summary appendix for UAAG 1.0
Friday, 23 March 2001
- 23 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available
- Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 22 March 2001
- Re: 19 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available
- Re: 19 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available
Thursday, 22 March 2001
- Re: Editorial nits in UAAG10
- Re: Editorial nits in UAAG10
- Re: 19 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available
- Re: Editorial nits in UAAG10
- Re: 19 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available
- Raw minutes from 22 March 2001 UAWG teleconference
- Re: input api naming conventions:
- Re: input api naming conventions:
- Re: input api naming conventions:
- input api naming conventions:
- Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 22 March 2001
- Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 22 March 2001
- RE: [Conformance] Proposals regarding content/ui labels,input de vice conformance, and conformance example
- FW: [Conformance] Proposals regarding content/ui labels, input de vice conformance, and conformance example
- Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 22 March 2001
Wednesday, 21 March 2001
- AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 22 March 2001
- Re: Proposal checkpiont 2.7: Solution for repair text shouldnot be minimal requirement
- [Conformance] Proposals regarding content/ui labels, input device conformance, and conformance example
- Extending my action item...
Tuesday, 20 March 2001
- Re: UA comments
- Re: UA comments
- Re: UA comments
- Re: UA comments
- UA comments
- regrets
- RE: March 9 Draft of UAAG
- on search termination:
- RE: March 9 Draft of UAAG
- 19 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available
Monday, 19 March 2001
- RE: 9 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available
- Re: 9 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available
- Re: March 9 Draft of UAAG
- RE: March 9 Draft of UAAG
- Re: Proposal checkpiont 2.7: Solution for repair text should not be minimal requirement
- Re: Proposal: Checkpoint 2.2: Move information about text formats from Note to checkpoint
- Re: Proposal: Checkpoint 2.2: Move information about textformats from Note to checkpoint
- Re: Proposal: Checkpoint 2.2: Move information about textformats from Note to checkpoint
- Re: March 9 Draft of UAAG
- Re: Responses to Bryan Campbell issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
Sunday, 18 March 2001
Monday, 19 March 2001
Sunday, 18 March 2001
- Re: [Editorial] Re-align speech checkpoint with CSS2 terminology
- Re: Normative in UAAG10 (and other W3C TRs)
- Re: Normative in UAAG10 (and other W3C TRs)
- Re: Normative in UAAG10 (and other W3C TRs)
- [Action] Toggling placeholders
Saturday, 17 March 2001
- [Proposal] Activation of placeholders [Was: Raw minutes from 15 March 2001 UAWG teleconference]
- [Action] Proposal to clarify checkpoint 2.9
- Issue 465: Proposal to address conformance through pointing device and voice input
- info:Fw: A Significant Winamp Upgrade now Available
- RE: Responses to Eric Hansen issue raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- [Editorial] Re-align speech checkpoint with CSS2 terminology
- [Conformance] Issue 413: Need to do better job at clarifying what checkpoints apply to content/ui/both
- Response to T.V. Raman issue raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Responses to Eric Hansen issue raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Responses to Karl Dubost issue raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Responses to Bryan Campbell issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Responses to HTML WG issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Responses to Richard Premack issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Responses to Constantine Stephanidis issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- [editorial] conformance vs. device independence
- Re: Responses to Al Gilman issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Responses to WCAG WG issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Responses to Dianna Callesen issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Al Gilman issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Earl Johnson issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Phill Jenkins issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Martin Duerst (I18N) issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Responses to Earl Johnson issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
Friday, 16 March 2001
- Responses to Phill Jenkins issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Responses to Martin Duerst (I18N) issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- Responses to Greg Lowney issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
Thursday, 15 March 2001
- Raw minutes from 15 March 2001 UAWG teleconference
- Re: Proposal checkpiont 2.7: Solution for repair text should not be minimal requirement
- March 9 Draft of UAAG
- Re: Proposal: Delete (special case) checkpoint 1.2
- Re: Proposal: Delete (special case) checkpoint 1.2
- Re: Proposal: Delete (special case) checkpoint 1.2
- Checkpoint 9.1: Delete sentence about pointing device interaction
- acrobat 5 accessible document creation guide
- Re: Proposal: Delete (special case) checkpoint 1.2
- Proposal checkpiont 2.7: Solution for repair text should not be minimal requirement
- RE: Proposal: Delete (special case) checkpoint 1.2
- Proposal: Checkpoint 2.2: Move information about text formats from Note to checkpoint
- Proposal: Delete (special case) checkpoint 1.2
- Re: Issue and techniques for Checkpoint 9.3
- DRAFT Executive Summary
- RE: 9 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available
Wednesday, 14 March 2001
- Fw: Press Release: Reef Debuts EveryWare [nee Edapta]
- RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 15 March 2001
- AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 15 March 2001
Tuesday, 13 March 2001
- Issue and techniques for Checkpoint 9.3
- Re: Real world example of destructive onfocus
- Re: Real world example of destructive onfocus
- Re: Real world example of destructive onfocus
- Re: Real world example of destructive onfocus
- Re: Real world example of destructive onfocus
- TECHNIQUES and IMPLEMENTATION: Images of graphical controls for adjusting speech and dictionary entries for IBM ViaVoice Technology
- RE: [Clarification] "Single key means single physical key"
Monday, 12 March 2001
- Re: [Clarification] "Single key means single physical key"
- Re: [Clarification] "Single key means single physical key"
- RE: [Clarification] "Single key means single physical key"
- Responses to Al Gilman issues raised during second last call of UAAG 1.0
- [Clarification] "Single key means single physical key"
- [CLARIFICATION] Re: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording
- RE: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording
- RE: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording
- RE: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording
- Re: Making all interactive elements visible
Sunday, 11 March 2001
- Re: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording
- Re: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording
- Re: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording
- Re: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording
- Re: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording
- Re: Normative in UAAG10 (and other W3C TRs)
- RE: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording
- Re: Normative in UAAG10 (and other W3C TRs)
- Re: Editorial nits in UAAG10
- Re: Making all interactive elements visible
- Re: Editorial nits in UAAG10
- Re: Normative in UAAG10 (and other W3C TRs)
- Editorial nits in UAAG10
- Normative in UAAG10 (and other W3C TRs)
- Re: 9 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available
- Re: Real world example of destructive onfocus
- Re: Making all interactive elements visible
Saturday, 10 March 2001
- Re: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording
- RE: Contradictory/confusing requirements wording
- Focus ambiguity problem
- Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review
- Re: Making all interactive elements visible
- Real world example of destructive onfocus
- 9 March 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available
- Contradictory/confusing requirements wording
Friday, 9 March 2001
- Re: Navigation without side-effects
- Re: Making all interactive elements visible
- Re: Making all interactive elements visible
- Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review
- Re: [Fwd: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review]
- Re: Product accessibility documentation dissenting report
Thursday, 8 March 2001
- Re: Software tools for captioning
- FYI: Digital Talking Book Document Navigation Features List
- Raw minutes from 8 March 2001 UAWG teleconference
- Sample SMIL demos
- special announcement!Fw: CREN Webcast on Web accessibility, Thursday March 8 4pm US EST
- Re: Change in Priority for new event checkpoints
- Fwd: Re: User Agent Update (documentation information) (fwd)
- Proposal for addressing animation questions [Was Re: Animation]
- Re: Navigation without side-effects
- Re: Making all interactive elements visible
- Re: Making all interactive elements visible
- Re: Making all interactive elements visible
- Re: Making all interactive elements visible
- Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review
- Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review
- Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review
- Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review
- Re: Change in Priority for new event checkpoints
- Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review
- Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review
- Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review
- Re: Proposed changes to checkpoints related to focus, selection, and current viewport
- Re: Proposed changes to checkpoints related to focus, selection, and current viewport
- Re: Change in Priority for new event checkpoints
- Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review
- Re: Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review
- Re: Making all interactive elements visible
- Re: [Action] Two proposed Guideline splits
- Re: [Action] Two proposed Guideline splits
- Re: Change in Priority for new event checkpoints
- Change in Priority for new event checkpoints
- [Action] Two proposed Guideline splits
- Proposed editorial changes based on Aaron Leventhal review
- AGENDA: W3C WAI User Agent Teleconference 8 March 2001
Wednesday, 7 March 2001
Thursday, 8 March 2001
Wednesday, 7 March 2001
- Re: Product accessibility documentation dissenting report
- Re: Product accessibility documentation dissenting report
- Re: Product accessibility documentation dissenting report
- Re: Product accessibility documentation dissenting report
Tuesday, 6 March 2001
- Re: Navigation without side-effects
- Re: User Agent Update (documentation information)
- Re: User Agent Update
- User Agent Update
- Re: WAI CG: Reminder, meeting today Tuesday 6 March, 2001
- RE: Navigation without side-effects
- RE: Navigation without side-effects
- Re: Making all interactive elements visible
- Re: What's the real-life meaning of an element?
- Navigation without side-effects
- Making all interactive elements visible
- Single keystroke commands
- What's the real-life meaning of an element?
- Animation
Monday, 5 March 2001
Sunday, 4 March 2001
Friday, 2 March 2001
- Raw minutes from 2 March UAWG face-to-face available.
- Question for Tim Lacy
- Product accessibility documentation dissenting report
- Orientation to actions of the active element
- Minutes from 1 March UAWG ftf
Thursday, 1 March 2001
- Another issue for DOM WG meeting
- sections of SVG spec I was talking about
- Bridge now open for 1-2 March UA ftf meeting
Wednesday, 28 February 2001
Tuesday, 27 February 2001
- RE: Questions regarding animation requirements in UAAG 1.0
- RE: Questions regarding animation requirements in UAAG 1.0
- RE: Questions regarding animation requirements in UAAG 1.0
- Re: Summary of UA discussion with CSS WG
- Re: Questions regarding animation requirements in UAAG 1.0
- Re: Questions regarding animation requirements in UAAG 1.0
Monday, 26 February 2001
- Summary of UA discussion with CSS WG
- Re: Checkpoint 4.13 (speech parameters): Seeking clarification on requirements
- Re: Checkpoint 2.2 (timed input): Examples of "required user input"?
- RE: What are UA responsibilities when content "takes over" UI con trols?
- Re: What are UA responsibilities when content "takes over" UI controls?
- Re: Checkpoint 4.13 (speech parameters): Seeking clarification on requirements
- Re: Issue 435: Proposal to address non-normative nature of checkpoint groupings
- Re: Agenda items for face-to-face meeting
- RE: Checkpoint 2.2 (timed input): Examples of "required user input"?
- RE: What are UA responsibilities when content "takes over" UI controls?
- Re: Agenda items for face-to-face meeting
Sunday, 25 February 2001
Saturday, 24 February 2001
Sunday, 25 February 2001
Saturday, 24 February 2001
- Checkpoint 2.2 (timed input): Examples of "required user input"?
- What are UA responsibilities when content "takes over" UI controls?
- RE: Questions regarding animation requirements in UAAG 1.0
- RE: Conditional versus Optional: Preliminary Observations
Friday, 23 February 2001
- Checkpoint 4.13 (speech parameters): Seeking clarification on requirements
- RE: Issue 435: Proposal to address non-normative nature of checkp oint groupings
- Issue 435: Proposal to address non-normative nature of checkpoint groupings
- RE: Conditional versus Optional: Preliminary Observations
- RE: [Action] Issue 443: Repair of device-dependent author-specifiedbehavior.
- RE: [Action] Issue 443: Repair of device-dependent author-specified behavior.
- RE: Conditional versus Optional: Preliminary Observations
- RE: Conditional versus Optional: Preliminary Observations
- RE: Conditional versus Optional: Preliminary Observations
Thursday, 22 February 2001
- Conditional versus Optional: Preliminary Observations
- Raw minutes from 22 Feb 2001 UA teleconference
- Re: MPEG 4
- RE: [Action] Proposal to address issues 394, 359, 358, 322, and 3 21 (checkpoints 2.1, 2.3, 2.6, 2.7, definitions)
- Re: [Action] Proposal to address issues 394, 359, 358, 322, and 321 (checkpoints 2.1, 2.3, 2.6, 2.7, definitions)
- MPEG 4
- REVIEW: Proposals for outstanding issues
- Re: [Action] Proposal to address issues 394, 359, 358, 322, and 321 (checkpoints 2.1, 2.3, 2.6, 2.7, definitions)
- Re: Marking image-maps
- Questions regarding animation requirements in UAAG 1.0
- [Action] Proposal to address issues 394, 359, 358, 322, and 321 (checkpoints 2.1, 2.3, 2.6, 2.7, definitions)
- Re: [Action] Issue 443: Repair of device-dependent author-specified behavior.
- Re: [Action] Issue 443: Repair of device-dependent author-specifiedbehavior.
- Re: [Action] Issue 443: Repair of device-dependent author-specified behavior.
- Re: [Action] Issue 443: Repair of device-dependent author-specified behavior.
- Re: Software accessibility demonstrations as the plenary
Wednesday, 21 February 2001
- [Action] Issue 443: Repair of device-dependent author-specified behavior.
- RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 22 February 2001
- AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 22 February 2001
- Re: Marking image-maps
- Marking image-maps
Tuesday, 20 February 2001
Monday, 19 February 2001
- Re: Raw minutes from 1 February 2001 UA Guidelines teleconf
- Re: Raw minutes from 1 February 2001 UA Guidelines teleconf
- Re: Raw minutes from 1 February 2001 UA Guidelines teleconf
- Re: Raw minutes from 1 February 2001 UA Guidelines teleconf
- Re: Raw minutes from 1 February 2001 UA Guidelines teleconf
- Re: Raw minutes from 1 February 2001 UA Guidelines teleconf
Sunday, 18 February 2001
Thursday, 15 February 2001
- Re: Mouse Snap/Zap functionality
- Mouse Snap/Zap functionality
- Raw minutes from 15 February 2001 UA Guidelines teleconf
- Re: Mouse activate JavaScript
- Re: Action Item: Mouse activate JavaScript
Wednesday, 14 February 2001
- RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 15 February 2001
- AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 15 February 2001
Tuesday, 13 February 2001
- Re: User Agent Executive Summary
- RE: User Agent Executive Summary
- User Agent Executive Summary
- Registration for UA FTF meeting
- Re: Keyboard support of mouse events for UAAG
Monday, 12 February 2001
- RE: Repair of Pointer Based Events
- RE: Repair of Pointer Based Events
- Re: Keyboard support of mouse events for UAAG
Sunday, 11 February 2001
Saturday, 10 February 2001
Friday, 9 February 2001
- Re: Repair of Pointer Based Events
- Re: Repair of Pointer Based Events
- Re: Repair of Pointer Based Events
- Re: Repair of Pointer Based Events
- Re: Repair of Pointer Based Events
- Re: Keyboard support of mouse events for UAAG
- Re: Repair of Pointer Based Events
- Keyboard support of mouse events for UAAG
- Repair of Pointer Based Events
- voice command browser.
Thursday, 8 February 2001
Wednesday, 7 February 2001
- FW: media:Fw: Consumers combat pop-ups with software, Tricks
- Re: AGENDA: W3C WAI User Agent Guidelines 8 February 2001
- AGENDA: W3C WAI User Agent Guidelines 8 February 2001
- [Announcement] "Common User Agent Problems" published
Tuesday, 6 February 2001
Monday, 5 February 2001
Thursday, 1 February 2001
- Raw minutes from 1 February 2001 UA Guidelines teleconf
- Web TV example of directional navigation
- Re: problems with Checkpoint 2.1
- Re: problems with Checkpoint 2.1
- problems with Checkpoint 2.1
Wednesday, 31 January 2001
- Re: Clarifications to definition of "active element"
- RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 1 Febraury 2001
- Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 1 February 2001
- Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 1 February 2001
- Re: Clarifications to definition of "active element"
- Re: Clarifications to definition of "active element"
- Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 1 February 2001
- Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 1 February 2001
Tuesday, 30 January 2001
- AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 1 February 2001
- Re: Instruction and Assessment
- RE: Instruction and Assessment
- RE: Instruction and Assessment
- RE: Instruction and Assessment
- Re: Instruction and Assessment
- RE: Instruction and Assessment
- Re: Instruction and Assessment
- RE: Instruction and Assessment
- Call for Papers: New international journal UNIVERSAL ACCESS IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY
- Re: Instruction and Assessment
- RE: Instruction and Assessment
- Re: Clarifications to definition of "active element"
- Re: Clarifications to definition of "active element"
Monday, 29 January 2001
- RE: Instruction and Assessment
- Re: Instruction and Assessment
- RE: Instruction and Assessment
- RE: Instruction and Assessment
- RE: Clarifications to definition of "active element"
- RE: Instruction and Assessment
- Re: Clarifications to definition of "active element"
Saturday, 27 January 2001
Friday, 26 January 2001
- RE: Clarifications to definition of "active element"
- Re: Clarifications to definition of "active element"
- RE: Clarifications to definition of "active element"
- 26 Jan 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available
- Re: Client-side redirection is timed input
- Re: Client-side redirection is timed input
- Re: Clarifications to definition of "active element"
- RE: Clarifications to definition of "active element"
- RE: Instruction and Assessment
- Alert to guide-dog users travelling to Europe--
- Congratulations, David
- Clarifications to definition of "active element"
Thursday, 25 January 2001
- Re: Instruction and Assessment
- Re: Raw minutes of 25 Jan 2001 UA teleconference
- Re: Client-side redirection is timed input
- Client-side redirection is timed input
- RE: Meaning of "important special case"
- Re: Meaning of "important special case"
- RE: Meaning of "important special case"
- Re: Meaning of "important special case"
- Meaning of "important special case"
- Raw minutes of 25 Jan 2001 UA teleconference
- Audio rate change -- function of user audiogram
- Fwd: FW: UAAG 1.0 last call comments
- configuring disabling of programatic objects
- Re: Checkpoint 2.2: For presentations only?
- Re: Checkpoint 2.2: For presentations only?
- Re: Checkpoint 2.2: For presentations only?
- Re: Priorities of Checkpoints 3.6 and 3.7
- Re: Checkpoint 2.2: For presentations only?
- Re: Priorities of Checkpoints 3.6 and 3.7
- Re: Priorities of Checkpoints 3.6 and 3.7
- Re: Checkpoint 2.2: For presentations only?
- Re: Priorities of Checkpoints 3.6 and 3.7
- Re: Question regarding animation requirements in UAAG 1.0
- Re: Question regarding animation requirements in UAAG 1.0
- Re: (Action): Proposals and questions about "presentations" and "animations" [Issue 430]
Wednesday, 24 January 2001
- RE: AGENDA: W3C WAI User Agent Teleconference 25 January, 2001
- Re: AGENDA: W3C WAI User Agent Teleconference 25 January, 2001
- (Action): Proposals and questions about "presentations" and "animations" [Issue 430]
- Question regarding animation requirements in UAAG 1.0
- Priorities of Checkpoints 3.6 and 3.7
- Re: per my action item on mouse binding configuration
- Re: Raw minutes from 22 Jan 2001 UAWG teleconference
Tuesday, 23 January 2001
- AGENDA: W3C WAI User Agent Teleconference 25 January, 2001
- Re: Checkpoint 2.2: For presentations only?
- RE: Checkpoint 2.2: For presentations only?
- Checkpoint 2.2: For presentations only?
- RE: Issue 454: Raising Priority of Checkpoints 3.6 and 3.7 related to automatic updates or redirects of content
- Re: Raw minutes from 22 Jan 2001 UAWG teleconference
- RE: Issue 454: Raising Priority of Checkpoints 3.6 and 3.7 related to automatic updates or redirects of content
- RE: Issue 454: Raising Priority of Checkpoints 3.6 and 3.7 related to automatic updates or redirects of content
Monday, 22 January 2001
- Issue 454: Raising Priority of Checkpoints 3.6 and 3.7 related to automatic updates or redirects of content
- Raw minutes from 22 Jan 2001 UAWG teleconference
- per my action item on mouse binding configuration
- Extra UA telecon today: 2:00 (EST), Phone: 617-252-7000
Friday, 19 January 2001
- Re: (Action) Issue 448: Proposed modification to Note after checkpoint 5.9 (DOM2 CSS)
- AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference (extra) 22 January
- RE: using javscript to simulate mouse events
- (Action) Issue 448: Proposed modification to Note after checkpoint 5.9 (DOM2 CSS)
Thursday, 18 January 2001
Wednesday, 17 January 2001
- Comments on 16 January 2001 Draft
- RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 18 January 2001
- AGENDA ADDITION: W3C User Agent Teleconference 18 January 2001
- Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 18 January 2001
- AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 18 January 2001
- 16 Jan 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques availability
Tuesday, 16 January 2001
Monday, 15 January 2001
- Status summary for UAAG 1.0
- (Action) Issue 327: Proposed checkpoint for character encoding support in APIs
Saturday, 13 January 2001
Friday, 12 January 2001
Thursday, 11 January 2001
- ANNOUNCEMENT: Extra telecon (response requested)
- Raw minutes from 11 January 2001 UAWG teleconference
- AGENDA ADDITIONS: W3C User Agent Teleconference 11 January
- Re: Proposal: Merge checkpoints about text foreground and background colors (4.3/4.4)
- ACTION ITEM: Things that can be recognized in scripting language for vieport control
- Re: Issue 429: Please reconsider resolution to add techniques about sharing user preferences
- Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Telecon 11 January 2001
- Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Telecon 11 January 2001
Wednesday, 10 January 2001
- Issue 429: Please reconsider resolution to add techniques about sharing user preferences
- RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 11 January 2001
- appology
- AGENDA: W3C User Agent Telecon 11 January 2001
Tuesday, 9 January 2001
- technique suggestion for UAAG 6.2
- Raw minutes from 9 Jan 2001 UAWG teleconference
- [Implementation report] [Fwd: Question re: ECash client user interface configuration]
- Proposed definition: text decoration
- [Implementation report] Re: Proposal to reconsider resolution to issue 420
- Re: (Action) Issue 394: Proposed revision to checkpoint 2.1
- Re: (Action) Issue 394: Proposed revision to checkpoint 2.1
- Re: (Action) Issue 394: Proposed revision to checkpoint 2.1
- Re: (Action) Issue 394: Proposed revision to checkpoint 2.1
Monday, 8 January 2001
- RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 9 January
- Re: (Action) Issue 370: Proposed rewording for checkpoint 7.6 (and Note)
- Re: (Action) Issue 394: Proposed revision to checkpoint 2.1
- Re: (Action) Issue 394: Proposed revision to checkpoint 2.1
- Re: (Action) Issue 392: Proposed change to checkpoint 1.4
- Meeting page available for 1-2 March 2001 face-to-face
- Re: (Action) Issue 387: Proposed revision to checkpoint 8.4
- Re: (Action) Issue 387: Proposed revision to checkpoint 8.4
- Re: PROPOSAL: Issue 361
- RE: (Action) Issue 394: Proposed revision to checkpoint 2.1
- RE: (Action) Issue 387: Proposed revision to checkpoint 8.4
- Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 9 January 2001
- AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 9 January 2001
- Re: (Action) Issue 370: Proposed rewording for checkpoint 7.6 (and Note)
- Re: (Action) Issue 370: Proposed rewording for checkpoint 7.6 (and Note)
- Re: Issue 364: Request to review decision to add plug-ins to checkpoint 3.5
- Re: motionless?
Sunday, 7 January 2001
- Re: (Action) Issue 392: Proposed change to checkpoint 1.4
- Re: (Action) Issue 392: Proposed change to checkpoint 1.4
- Re: (Action) Issue 394: Proposed revision to checkpoint 2.1
- (Action) Issue 394: Proposed revision to checkpoint 2.1
Saturday, 6 January 2001
- (Action) Issue 392: Proposed change to checkpoint 1.4
- Re: Issue 364: Request to review decision to add plug-ins to checkpoint 3.5
- Re: Issue 364: Request to review decision to add plug-ins to checkpoint 3.5
- Re: Issue 364: Request to review decision to add plug-ins to checkpoint 3.5
- (Action) Issue 389: Request for clarification about conformance comments
- Re: (Action) Issue 370: Proposed rewording for checkpoint 7.6 (and Note)
- Re: Issue 375: Resolved by issue 323?
- Re: (Action) Issue 387: Proposed revision to checkpoint 8.4
- Re: (Action) Issue 387: Proposed revision to checkpoint 8.4
- Re: PROPOSAL: Issue 361
- (Action) Issue 387: Proposed revision to checkpoint 8.4
- Re: PROPOSAL: Issue 361
- Checkpoint 3.8: Unintentional omission of placeholders
- Re: (Action) Issue 370: Proposed rewording for checkpoint 7.6 (and Note)
- Re: UAAG 1.0: review comments from Adobe Systems
- Issue 375: Resolved by issue 323?
- (Action) Issue 370: Proposed rewording for checkpoint 7.6 (and Note)
- Issue 364: Request to review decision to add plug-ins to checkpoint 3.5
- Re: motionless?
- Re: motionless?
Friday, 5 January 2001
- RE: motionless?
- Re: motionless?
- RE: Issue 357: Proposed revision to applicability provision
- Issue 357: Proposed revision to applicability provision
- Re: motionless?
- Re: motionless?
- ANNOUNCEMENT: Extra Telecon
- Re: Raw minutes from 4 January 2001 UAWG teleconference
- Draft of proposed glossary
- Re: [Implementation report] Re: Proposal to reconsider resolution to issue 420
- [Implementation report] Re: Proposal to reconsider resolution to issue 420
Thursday, 4 January 2001
- Raw minutes from 4 January 2001 UAWG teleconference
- Changes in 29 December 2000 version of UAAG 1.0
- Re: motionless?
- Re: motionless?
- motionless?
Wednesday, 3 January 2001
- RSVP: W3C User Agent Telecon 4 January 2000
- AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 4 Janaury 2001
- Re: Proposal: Merge checkpoints about text foreground and background colors (4.3/4.4)