- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:01:47 -0400
- To: "gregory j. rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>
- CC: David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
"gregory j. rosmaita" wrote: > > aloha, ian! > > one of the problems with the new "distributed" UAAG 1.0 is that it is > impossible to ascertain the date of the document one is reading from > within a sub-section, unless that sub-section happens to be cover.html > > this is a really annoying aspect of the chopping up of technical > recommendations into bite-sized morsels... why isn't there a W3C Process > guarding against this? if date-stamps are important enough to embed in > URIs, surely they should be repeated somewhere in a document which "may be > updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time" I can repeat the status and date information at the top of each chapter. I would note that the more metadata we duplicate the more burdensome it will become to read the document. However, date and status label (e.g., Working Draft) seems reasonable. - Ian > gregory. > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Ian B. Jacobs wrote: > > David Poehlman wrote: > > > > > > what does next mean at the top of the page? > > > > In the new "distributed" UAAG 1.0, the first link > > on each page is "next", which takes you to the next > > chapter. It is followed by "contents", which takes > > you to the main table of contents. > > > > _ Ian > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > ABSURDITY, n. A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's > own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce, _The Devils' Dictionary_ > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Gregory J. Rosmaita, oedipus@hicom.net > Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/index.html > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 831 457-2842 Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2001 14:01:55 UTC