- From: gregory j. rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 14:31:24 -0400
- To: <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
aloha! while overall, i think ian did an excellent job modularizing UAAG, i do have a few preliminary Quality Assurance (QA) type questions about the modularized UAAG: 1. why isn't the Navigation bar that appears at the top of cover.html not replicated on each constituent document? why is there not a navigation bar at the bottom of each page? 2. why are the filenames for UAAG and UAAG-TECHS identical? if one attempts to unarchive the hypertext version of the modularized document into a single directory (such as C:\HTML\W3C\WAI\UA), one is forced to change the filenames in any case, so as to avoid (a) overwriting files with identical names and (b) wasting hard drive space through the replication of the contents of the sub-directories contained in the archives, which includes duplicate copies of all of the images used in the guidelines... of course, if one changes the names of the files contained in the UAAG-TECHS archive, the links from UAAG to UAAG-TECHS all break... would it not, therefore, be better to distinguish between UAAG and UAAG-TECHS rather than provide users with 2 archives containing identically named files with distinct content? UAAG filename: cover.html UAAG-TECHS filename: techs-cover.html (or cover-techs.html) UAAG filename: guidelines.html UAAG-TECHS filename: techs-guidelines.html (or guidelines-techs.html) etc. 3. i couldn't find a listing of ACCESSKEYs for each component of the modularized UAAG -- shouldn't the "Previous" "Next" and "Contents" have ACCESSKEYs associated with them? gregory.
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2001 14:30:23 UTC