- From: mark novak <menovak@facstaff.wisc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:37:09 -0500
- To: jim@jimthatcher.com
- Cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
hi Jim (see MN below): >You have heard from Cathy Laws that the Browse Button is recognized with HPR >and so you can conclude it is in the DOM since that is where HPR gets the >data to speak. MN: I'm not disagree'ing with anything Cathy said, but I still do not understand "exactly" where the "browse" button is on this scenario. Is there a chance that HPR "understands" the INPUT TYPE="file" and creates the button in its' DOM? (not even sure I'm asking that correctly...) >But HPR is missing something. As a sighted user, I can type >in a file designation in the edit field. I think that is an HPR >implementation fault (design defect), not seeing that they should also >provide a text entry field along with the browse button. It isn't an >accessibility fault, however, since the browse button is adequate. > >I tried Window-Eyes which relies on MSAA, as I understand it. Neither the >Browse button nor the text entry field are known to them - but please note I >am not a Window-Eyes expert. That, in my opinion (and interpretation), is a >bug for MSAA. MN: based on the quick test I did prior using the MSAA object inspector, i'd agree that the button is not properly exposed in IE for MSAA to query/find. >As I understand it, JFW parses HTML and, like HPR, JFW has a flaw in their >interpretation of the validate page, only finding the edit field, not the >browse button. > >In all three cases, it seems to me it is not an issue for the content >provider, but for the assistive technology instead. MN: until I understand this, i'm not ready to say that. mark
Received on Monday, 23 April 2001 17:33:04 UTC