Re: Minimum requirements for checkpoint 7.3

On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Ian Jacobs wrote:

  Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
  >
  > This goes mostly to the definition of priorities in my opinion. Although it
  > adds a new checkpoint, it doesn't add a new requirement per se, simply
  > providing a further set of "minimum requirements" to the same checkpoint in
  > order to satisfy a higher level of accessibility.
  >
  > As Greg pointed out, simple forwards navigation only provides a very low
  > level of accessibility - all the content can be accessed (meeting the
  > defining requirement for level A) but to overcome a significant obstacle
  > further access is required (i.e. meeting the definitive requirement for
  > double-A).

  I think that since we require structured navigation later in the
  document, that we are covered.

   - Ian

This also occurred to me. Greg?

Charles

Received on Tuesday, 26 December 2000 12:13:10 UTC