W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > October to December 2000

Re: Minimum requirements for checkpoint 7.3

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 12:13:07 -0500 (EST)
To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
cc: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>, <greglo@microsoft.com>, <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>, <timla@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0012261212380.11899-100000@tux.w3.org>
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Ian Jacobs wrote:

  Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
  > This goes mostly to the definition of priorities in my opinion. Although it
  > adds a new checkpoint, it doesn't add a new requirement per se, simply
  > providing a further set of "minimum requirements" to the same checkpoint in
  > order to satisfy a higher level of accessibility.
  > As Greg pointed out, simple forwards navigation only provides a very low
  > level of accessibility - all the content can be accessed (meeting the
  > defining requirement for level A) but to overcome a significant obstacle
  > further access is required (i.e. meeting the definitive requirement for
  > double-A).

  I think that since we require structured navigation later in the
  document, that we are covered.

   - Ian

This also occurred to me. Greg?

Received on Tuesday, 26 December 2000 12:13:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:38:29 UTC