Re: PROPOSAL: Issue 361

I agree as well.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Harvey Bingham" <hbingham@ACM.org>
To: "Jon Gunderson" <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>; <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Sent: November 21, 2000 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: Issue 361


At 2000-11-20 14:15-0600, Jon Gunderson wrote:
>I suggest that we do not change checkpoint 4.14 (other than for other
>resolved changes for adding language), but add the following note
after
>the checkpoint.
>
>[NEW]
>Note: Many speech synthesizers confound the specification of voice
gender,
>pitch range, stress, richness in named voice labels that use pitch
range,
>stress and richness parameters to help create different voice sounds
(i.e
>adult male, child female, robot voice).  When using these
synthesizers
>make available the full range of voices.
>[/NEW]

Well-stated, I agree.
Regards/Harvey

Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2000 08:55:22 UTC