- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:07:40 -0500
- To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- CC: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Al Gilman wrote:
>
> This note contains a collection of mislocutions that detract from the
> comprehensibility of the document.
[snip]
> 5) [Checkpoint group header introducing checkpoints 4.5 through 4.9]
>
> Simply say "Checkpoints for accessibility of continuous-time content."
>
> The explanation in terms of a list of buzz words only understood by reference
> to the glossary is [not the high point of comprehensibility in this document].
I do not agree with this one. I'm not convinced that saying
"continuous-time content" will inform many users about what these
checkpoints address. Of the current language ("...multimedia
presentations,
audio-only presentations, and visual-only presentations...") I believe
multimedia to be the most useful.
- Ian
> Re:
>
> User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0
>
> W3C Working Draft 23 October 2000
>
> This version:
>
> [9]<http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-UAAG10-20001023>http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/W
> D-UAAG10-20001023
--
Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel: +1 831 457-2842
Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Tuesday, 14 November 2000 15:07:47 UTC