- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 01:27:58 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
[This part of the document is a little unstructured. Bear with me. This comment pertains to the final bullet in the inner bullet list in section 3.3. where it says] + The checkpoint requires control of content properties (e.g., video or animation rate) that the subject cannot control (e.g., the format does not allow it) or does not [594]recognize (e.g., because the property is controlled by a script in a manner that the subject cannot recognize). This exception is dangerously broad. This is a barn door through which any and all requirements could be waived. It should be reconsidered. Al -- Usage in headers. Comments in response to the last call request for comments have been classified S1, S2, or E based on the following rough scale: S1: Substantive matter of the first (highest) criticality or importance to the mission of the document. The standard set is ineffective, the document is self contradictory, etc. S2: Substantive matter of a somewhat lower criticality. The document is hard to comprehend, does not align well with related WAI documents, etc. E: Editorial matters. Not regarded as substantive. Re: User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 W3C Working Draft 23 October 2000 This version: [9]<http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-UAAG10-20001023>http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/W D-UAAG10-20001023
Received on Monday, 13 November 2000 00:57:09 UTC