- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 01:27:18 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
The definition and use of priorities in this document is not consistent with their use in WCAG 1.0. For example, checkpoint 7.3 does not meet WCAG standards for Priority 1, but is rather in WCAG terms a Priority 2 (document effectively useless, not completely unusable). This is a thorny issue, as it is not clear that the priorities and conformance scheme in WCAG 1.0 is the best possible approach in this area. But doing something that looks the same but isn't the same has problems of its own. This issue might benefit from some coordination outside the Working Group. Al -- Usage in headers. Comments in response to the last call request for comments have been classified S1, S2, or E based on the following rough scale: S1: Substantive matter of the first (highest) criticality or importance to the mission of the document. The standard set is ineffective, the document is self contradictory, etc. S2: Substantive matter of a somewhat lower criticality. The document is hard to comprehend, does not align well with related WAI documents, etc. E: Editorial matters. Not regarded as substantive. Re: User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 W3C Working Draft 23 October 2000 This version: [9]<http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-UAAG10-20001023>http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/W D-UAAG10-20001023
Received on Monday, 13 November 2000 00:56:29 UTC