- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 10:40:38 -0400
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, Janina Sajka <janina@afb.net>, "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <unagi69@concentric.net>, User Agent Guidelines Emailing List <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Ian Jacobs wrote: > > Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > My proposal is therefore to resolve this by adding a checkpoint at Priority > > level 2 or 3 (according to how importantly the groups rates ease of > > documentation use as a precondition of effective use of a tool), more or less > > as follows: > > > > Ensure that at least one version of the product documentation conforms to > > at least Level Triple-A of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 > > [WCAG10]. [Priority 2or3] > > I would support P3 checkpoint to this effect and oppose a P2 > checkpoint to this effect. Actually, let me change that opinion: if we agree to this P3 checkpoint at today's teleconference, I would support it. Otherwise, it will hold up going to last call and I will object to adding it. - Ian -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 831 457-2842 Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2000 10:42:40 UTC