- From: jon gunderson <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 09:32:57 -0600 (CST)
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Ian, Could we add that at least one of the output modes must be device independent. Jon On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Ian Jacobs wrote: > Hello, > > Issue 195 [1] states that reviewers of the Candidate Recommendation [2] > had difficulties understanding the wording of checkpoint 1.5: > > <BLOCKQUOTE> > 1.5 Ensure that the user interface provides information through > redundant output modes. [Priority 1] > </BLOCKQUOTE> > > Therefore I propose this clarification: > > <BLOCKQUOTE> > 1.5 Ensure that the user interface presents information through > more than one output mechanism. > > (Note afterwards): > For example, alert the user to an event with a graphical > cue, and an audio cue, and a text message on the status bar. > Refer also to checkpoint 5.4. > </BLOCKQUOTE> > > Also, we can add to the techniques document that the user may want > to configure the output modes. > > - Ian > > [1] http://cmos-eng.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear.html#195 > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-UAAG10-20000128 > -- > Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs > Tel/Fax: +1 212 684-1814 or 212 532-4767 > Cell: +1 917 450-8783 >
Received on Saturday, 26 February 2000 10:32:58 UTC