- From: mark novak <menovak@facstaff.wisc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 10:15:30 -0600
- To: Jon Gunderson <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <unagi69@concentric.net>, schwer@us.ibm.com, Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Cc: User Agent Guidelines Emailing List <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>, WAI Protocols & Formats WG <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>
hi Jon and all I agree that all elements ought to understand and implement the appropriate event model, so for the UA, I don't see my next comment changing the UA process at the moment. However, I'm not in favor of making this a priority 1, since I'm not a fan of the event model within DOM 2. This is an on-going (I hope ) discussion on the PF/DOM working group lists. After the events/event model are understood, this checkpoint may need re-visiting. mark At 8:55 AM 2/10/00, Jon Gunderson wrote: >It seems there is a consensus to merge 5.3 and 5.5 from my proposal into a >single checkpoint of at least Priority 2 and maybe a priority 1 level. The >new checkpoint would require implementation of the event model specified in >the Candidate Recommendation of DOM2 for all elements. > >Jon
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2000 11:12:31 UTC