- From: Gregory J. Rosmaita <unagi69@concentric.net>
- Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 20:57:21 -0500
- To: Jon Gunderson <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Cc: User Agent Guidelines Emailing List <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>, WAI Protocols & Formats WG <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>
aloha, jon!
while i agree with rich and charles that 5.5 should be at least a priority
2 checkpoint, isn't programmatic support for the event model key to
successfully tailoring an AT to work with any UA which supports the W3C DOM
Level 2 by providing access to the event model?
so wouldn't that make it not just at least a priority 2, but an outright
priority 1?
jon, did you originally accord it a p3 because of turn-around timing issues
vis a vis the implementation of DOM2 by industry? if so, perhaps we do
need to consider some sort of priority level that reflects that quote this
will be the best (read: required) way to do this when the following comes
to pass unquote... reopening the priority issue isn't a route that i
particularly want to travel, but in this instance, at least, perhaps valid...
gregory
--------------------------------------------------------
He that lives on Hope, dies farting
-- Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanack, 1763
--------------------------------------------------------
Gregory J. Rosmaita <unagi69@concentric.net>
WebMaster and Minister of Propaganda, VICUG NYC
<http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/vicug/index.html>
--------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2000 20:48:22 UTC