- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2000 15:33:28 -0500
- To: mark novak <menovak@facstaff.wisc.edu>
- CC: Jon Gunderson <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org, w3c-wai-pf@w3.org
mark novak wrote: > > hi Jon > > i'd be happy to participate in this call. thanks for asking. > > however, i'm concerned about the follow up discussion this request > has generated in DOM vs OSM vs API, etc. > > i'd advocate that DOM is just another tool/method, and if company A > chooses to use DOM, or an OSM, or some other idea, that is company A's > decision. i don't support the concept that *all* companies have to > use DOM . I understand the advantages and dis-advantages, just concerned > about any "tone" we present to the AT community. We talked about this at the ftf in Austin; the possibility of removing the DOM-specific part and making it a general requirement for exchange of content, with the DOM being one possible solution. Those at the ftf meeting felt the DOM was important enough to stand out. - Ian
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2000 15:34:32 UTC